Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Previous studies suggested that proprioceptive feedback for passive arm positioning and isometric forces deteriorates under water. Here we investigate whether a similar deficit exists for active arm positioning. Since deficits were attributed to a reduced muscle tone but findings about muscle tone in water are ambiguous, we re-evaluated this issue.
Methods: With their right forearm, 24 subjects reproduced visual templates which showed a forearm at 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees orientations in the sagittal plane on land (Dry) and during water immersion (Wet). Mean reproduction error and its standard deviation were calculated in allocentric (space-referenced) and egocentric (body-referenced) coordinates. Additionally, 12 of the 24 subjects also participated in an experiment where relaxed left arm EMG was registered in Wet and Dry.
Results: Mean error was comparable in Wet (7.72 degrees) and Dry (6.79 degrees), but error variability was significantly smaller in Wet (7.52 degrees) than in Dry (9.58 degrees). Errors in allocentric (3.42 degrees) differed from egocentric coordinates (11.08 degrees), independent of Wet and Dry. Resting EMG was significantly lower in Wet (3.02 microV) than in Dry (3.73 microV).
Discussion: Proprioceptive feedback for active arm movements is enhanced under water, probably due to high water viscosity, which increases spindle afferents during active but not passive arm movements or isometric responses. We found no evidence that the reference frame for orientation judgments differ between Wet and Dry. Muscle tone of the relaxed arm was reduced under water, corroborating that water immersion degrades proprioception during isometric tasks and passive arm positioning. This is probably not relevant for active arm movements, which seem to increase rather than decrease muscle force to overcome water's viscosity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3357/asem.3394.2013 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!