A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Medial femoral condyle flap donor-site morbidity: a radiographic assessment. | LitMetric

Medial femoral condyle flap donor-site morbidity: a radiographic assessment.

Plast Reconstr Surg

Baltimore, Md. From The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital.

Published: March 2013

Background: The medial femoral condyle has become a reliable source of vascularized bone with many advantages to the reconstructive microsurgeon. The authors examined the donor-site morbidity of medial femoral condyle flap harvest.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent medial femoral condyle free flap procedures between April of 2009 and December of 2010 was conducted. Study participants underwent computed tomographic scans of their bilateral distal femurs and knee joints to evaluate the donor site and examine differences between the operated and nonoperated sides.

Results: Fifteen patients underwent medial femoral condyle free flap procedures. Ten of them agreed to participate in the study. The average time between surgery and computed tomographic scans was 18.0 months (range, 12.2 to 30.4 months). Average bone harvested per procedure was 16.1 cm3 (range, 2 to 34 cm3), representing an average condylar volume of 9 percent (range, 1 to 18 percent). Reparative bone formation was minimal, with an average thickness of 4.5 mm (range, 4 to 6 mm). There were no findings of new degenerative joint disease on computed tomographic scans resulting from medial femoral condyle harvest. The flap success rate was 100 percent (10 of 10) for patency and achieving osseous union. There were no major or flap-related complications. Two patients reported numbness of the donor site at long-term follow-up (average, 17.5 months; range, 12.2 to 30.4 months).

Conclusions: Medial femoral condyle harvest creates minimal donor-site morbidity according to radiographic measures at more than 1-year follow-up. Surgeons can anticipate minimal unassisted bone regeneration at the donor site at this time interval.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6f38DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medial femoral
28
femoral condyle
28
donor-site morbidity
12
computed tomographic
12
tomographic scans
12
donor site
12
condyle flap
8
morbidity radiographic
8
patients underwent
8
underwent medial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!