Aims: To assess the acute side-effects of right ventricular (RV) stimulation applied in apex and mid-septum, in order to establish the optimal lead location in clinical practice.
Methods: During pacemaker implantation, the ventricular lead was temporarily fixed in the apex and then moved to mid-septum. In both positions, surface and endocardial electrograms and transvalvular impedance (32 cases), left ventricular (LV) pressure (23), and transthoracic echocardiography (10) were acquired with intrinsic activity and VDD pacing.
Results: A larger increase in QRS duration was noticed with apical than septal pacing (65±25 vs. 45±29 ms; P<10(-4)). The proportion of cases where RV stimulation affected the transvalvular impedance waveform was higher with apical lead location (56% vs. 20%; P<0.02). VDD pacing at either site reduced the maximum dP/dt by 6% with respect to intrinsic AV conduction (IAVC; P<0.005). The maximum pressure drop taking place in 100 ms was reduced by 6 and 8%, respectively, with apical and septal pacing (P<0.01 vs. IAVC). Apical VDD decreased mitral annulus velocity in early diastole (E') from 7.5±1.4 to 5.9±0.9 cm/s (P<0.02) and prolonged the E-wave deceleration time (DT) from 156±33 to 199±54 ms (P<0.02), while septal pacing induced non-significant modifications in E' and DT.
Conclusion: Ventricular stimulation acutely impairs LV systolic and diastolic performance, independent of the pacing site. Septal lead location preserves RV contraction mechanics and reduces the electrical interventricular delay.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2013.009 | DOI Listing |
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol
December 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Introduction: Patients who need tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) surgery often have permanent transvalvular pacemaker (PM) leads, which pose an important challenge in lead management.
Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of paravalvular positioning of a permanent pacemaker lead during TVR surgery.
Material And Methods: Between 2014 and 2024, a total of 15 patients who had previously had a transvenous pacemaker system underwent TVR.
Am J Cardiol
December 2023
Centro Cardiologico Monzino Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Low-flow low-gradient (LF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) may occur with preserved or depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Both situations represent the most challenging subset of patients to manage and generally have a poor prognosis. Few and controversial data exist on the outcomes of these patients compared with normal flow-high gradient (NF-HG) AS after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
December 2022
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220216, Taiwan.
Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) causes a high transvalvular pressure gradient and residual left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, consequently influencing long-term results. This study aimed to find the relationships between hemodynamic parameters and LV mass regression and determine the risk predictors of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis. Preoperative and postoperative Doppler echocardiography data were evaluated for 120 patients after AVR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Cardiovasc Med
December 2021
Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Hematology, Oncology and Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
The hemodynamic effects of aortic stenosis (AS) consist of increased left ventricular (LV) afterload, reduced myocardial compliance, and increased myocardial workload. The LV in AS patients faces a double load: valvular and arterial loads. As such, the presence of symptoms and occurrence of adverse events in AS should better correlate with calculating the global burden faced by the LV in addition to the transvalvular gradient and aortic valve area (AVA).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIndian Heart J
May 2021
Department of Cardiology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, India. Electronic address:
Background: Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LFLGAS) is a common clinical entity and is associated with poor prognosis. Increased left ventricular (LV) afterload is one of the mechanisms contributing to low LV stroke volume index (SVi) in these patients. Aortic stiffness is an important determinant of LV afterload, but no previous study has evaluated its relationship with LVSVi in patients with AS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!