Background: Intentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefore, shorten the length of labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the woman and baby.
Objectives: To determine the effectiveness and safety of amniotomy alone for routinely shortening all labours that start spontaneously.
Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 November 2010).
Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes. We excluded quasi-randomised trials.
Data Collection And Analysis: Two authors assessed identified studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention to treat.
Main Results: We have included 15 studies in this updated review, involving 5583 women. In the current review, data for women with spontaneous normal labour were pooled with data from one trial (involving 61 women) where women had spontaneous, but prolonged labour.There was no clear statistically significant difference between the amniotomy and control groups in length of the first stage of labour (mean difference (MD) -20.43 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) -95.93 to 55.06), caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.62), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.27, 95% CI -0.49 to 1.04) or low Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.06). There was no consistency between papers regarding the timing of amniotomy during labour in terms of cervical dilatation.
Authors' Conclusions: On the basis of the findings of this review, we cannot recommend that amniotomy should be introduced routinely as part of standard labour management and care. We recommend that the evidence presented in this review should be made available to women offered an amniotomy and may be useful as a foundation for discussion and any resulting decisions made between women and their caregivers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub3 | DOI Listing |
Lancet Reg Health Am
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Background: Cesarean delivery remains the most common obstetrical procedure with more than 250,000 patients in the US undergoing cesarean following labor induction annually. Here, we evaluated the impact of prospectively implementing a standardized labor induction protocol on cesarean delivery rates.
Methods: This multi-site type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation study compared 2 years before (PRE) and 2 years after (POST) implementation of a standardized labor induction protocol at two hospitals within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (2018-2022).
Medicine (Baltimore)
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taixing People's Hospital, Taixing, China.
The timing of amniotomy after the Foley balloon catheter removal is crucial for successful labor induction. This study aimed to assess the effects of the Bishop score on the timing of amniotomy in patients undergoing labor induction after the Foley balloon catheter removal. This was a retrospective cohort study based on electronic medical records.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Obstet Gynecol MFM
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Jalan Profesor Diraja Ungku Aziz, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address:
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
December 2024
Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, (RCSI), University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Objective: This secondary analysis evaluates the logistics of achieving vaginal delivery following outpatient induction. This includes changes in Bishop score before and after cervical ripening, the need for additional ripening agents, time interval from induction to delivery, all of which provide invaluable information when developing an outpatient induction of labour service.
Study Design: We randomised healthy nulliparous women with no significant medical history, who agreed to elective induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation, to one of three forms of initial cervical ripening at home: 12 h of Dilapan-S, 24 h of Dilapan-S, or 24 h of slow-release dinoprostone (Propess).
Minerva Obstet Gynecol
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sibu Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Sibu, Malaysia.
Background: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of membrane sweeping and transcervical Foley catheters for the induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery.
Methods: An open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed at Sibu Hospital, Sarawak, Malaysia between 15 February 2018 and 30 August 2018. Pregnant women aged 18 or above at term who had one previous uncomplicated lower segment cesarean section and required induction of labor were randomized to membrane sweeping or transcervical Foley catheter insertion.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!