AI Article Synopsis

  • To understand how much someone's blood sugar levels change over time, it's important to check their glucose levels often using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).
  • Sometimes, CGM might miss data for 10 minutes or more, which can make it hard to get accurate results.
  • Researchers found a way to replace the missing data by figuring out the difference between readings before and after the gaps and spreading that difference evenly across the missing time, making the overall analysis more reliable.

Article Abstract

Estimation of glycemic variability requires frequent measures of glucose and is greatly aided by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); however, under real-world conditions, missing data or "gaps" of ≥ 10 minutes can occur in CGM data, affecting the reliability of certain estimates. Thus, we determined the magnitude of the gap problem as observed in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes and demonstrated an approach to fill the gaps. The approach takes the difference between readings before and after a gap and distributes the difference equally across the number of missing readings, as determined by the sensor's setting for reading frequency. The approach is easy to implement, conservative, and improves estimation of variability measures that reference time, namely, mean of daily differences and continuous overlapping net glycemic action.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3692219PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/193229681300700110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

continuous glucose
8
glucose monitoring
8
minding gaps
4
gaps continuous
4
monitoring method
4
method repair
4
repair gaps
4
gaps achieve
4
achieve accurate
4
accurate glucometrics
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!