A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Monte Carlo simulation of in vivo measurement of the most suitable knee position for the optimal measurement of activity. | LitMetric

A new computational model has been developed using the Monte Carlo (MC) technique to simulate in vivo measurements with the objective of understanding the most precise measurement location with respect to quantifying the activity of Am in the bones. To benchmark the model, in vivo measurements were performed on the U.S. Transuranium and Uranium Registries (USTUR) case 0846 leg. Front and lateral measurements of the knee of the USTUR case 0846 leg in a bent position and the same measurements with the leg in a straight position using a HP(Ge) detector were completed. Experimental results concluded that the front measurement of the knee in a bent leg position gave the highest count rate, which is an indication of optimal detection efficiency. Therefore, this geometry and knee-detector position were considered as the most appropriate position for knee monitoring. A computational model using MCNPX version 2.6.0 was used to simulate the experimental measurements by using a leg voxel phantom. The mean value and standard deviation (SD) of peak efficiency due to an isotropic 59.5-keV photon from Am were calculated in four different counting geometries. An extra sum of squares F-test was performed on the mean values of the simulated detection efficiencies. The p-value obtained from this statistical test indicates that the differences among the mean values for different counting geometries were significant. These results suggest that the front measurement of a knee in a bent leg position is the optimal counting geometry for in vivo measurement of Am deposited in the bones. The computational model was validated through comparison of the measured and simulated detection efficiencies. It was observed that there is no difference at the 0.1 significant levels between the simulated and measured detection efficiencies in assessment of Am within the bones.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e318280a729DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computational model
12
detection efficiencies
12
monte carlo
8
vivo measurement
8
position optimal
8
vivo measurements
8
ustur case
8
case 0846
8
0846 leg
8
measurements leg
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!