[Analysis of needlestick and sharps injuries among medical staff in upper first-class hospital].

Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi

School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

Published: January 2013

Objective: To investigate the incidence of needlestick and sharps injuries among the medical staff in an upper first-class hospital and its risk factors and to provide a basis for the infection control department of hospital and health administration department to establish the policies for safe injection.

Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted in 800 healthcare professionals in an upper first-class hospital in Nanjing, China to investigate the incidence of needlestick and sharps injuries in the past year. A total of 641 persons completed the questionnaire, including 239 doctors, 348 nurses, and 54 other healthcare workers. The obtained data were subjected to chi-square test and logistic analysis.

Results: Needlestick and sharps injuries occurred in 373 of 641 healthcare professionals, with an incidence rate of 58.19%. There were significant differences in the incidence of needlestick and sharps injuries among the medical staff of different types or in different departments (P < 0.01). The syringe needles, glass, scalp infusion needles, and suture needles were the major medical apparatus that caused needlestick and sharps injuries; the incidence rate of injury caused by suture needles in doctors (48.21%) was significantly higher than that in nurses (6.72%) (P < 0.01), and the incidence rates of injuries caused by syringe needles, scalp infusion needles, and glass in nurses (71.15%, 59.68%, and 49.04%) were significantly higher than those in doctors (46.43%, 6.25%, and 16.96%) (P < 0.01); compared with nurses, the doctors had higher incidence rates of injuries due to body fluid or tissue sample collection, wound flushing, suture, and cutting (P < 0.05); compared with doctors, the nurses had higher incidence rates of injuries due to injection, intravenous infusion, heparin cap sealing, intravenous infusion line connection, and venous or arterial blood collection (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Needlestick and sharps injuries are common in medical staff. The results of the study on risk factors provide a basis for the infection control department of hospital and health administration department to establish the policies for safe injection.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

needlestick sharps
28
sharps injuries
28
medical staff
16
injuries medical
12
upper first-class
12
incidence needlestick
12
incidence rates
12
rates injuries
12
injuries
10
staff upper
8

Similar Publications

Operating room (OR) personnel are at a high risk for sharp injuries, which can cause serious side effects. The goals of this study are to analyze OR nurses and surgical technologists' experiences and their current level of sharps education. An anonymous survey was sent to a single institution asking whether the participants have been stuck by a sharp, when they were stuck, and their perspective on sharp safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Role of CRNAs in Reduction of Sharps Waste in the Operating Room.

AANA J

December 2024

Assistant Professor in the Doctor of Nurse Anesthesia Practice Program, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Email:

The purpose of this study was to identify and explore certified registered nurse anesthetists' (CRNA) knowledge, current practices, and barriers to proper sharps waste disposal practices in the operating room. Approximately 100 CRNAs who practice anesthesia in the Mid-Atlantic region at 10 different hospitals were given an electronic survey. Forty CRNAs completed the 15-question de novo quantitative descriptive survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The effect of COVID-19 (COrona VIrus Disease of 2019) pandemic on the rates and trends of needlestick and sharp injuries (NSSIs) and splash injuries (SIs) among health care providers (HCPs) is not well defined.

Methods: A retrospective study analyzed the rates of injuries among HCPs during the prepandemic (38 months) and pandemic (37 months) periods. Single interrupted time-series analysis (SITSA) was employed to assess the impact of the pandemic on injury rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bloodborne Infections Relevant to Dental Practice.

Int Dent J

November 2024

College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE. Electronic address:

The surgical nature of dental practice, which frequently includes a combination of using sharp tools and the presence of blood, puts dental practitioners at a significant risk for infection with bloodborne pathogens, mainly hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV. Several seroprevalence studies and case reports traced back newly diagnosed cases of hepatitis B and C to recent episodes of dental treatments. This paper provides an update on the prevalence of hepatitis B and C and HIV, the likelihood of acquiring an infection following an occupational injury, the manner in which serologic tests should be interpreted, and practical advice on ways to reduce the risk of occupational exposure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!