Objective: To investigate the agreement between two methods of measurement of plasma free cortisol in acutely ill patients; an indirect method using the Coolens equation, and direct measurement using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, which is the gold standard.

Design, Participants And Setting: Prospective observational study among patients with septic shock in a tertiary intensive care unit and patients with liver failure attending a hospital outpatient clinic while awaiting transplantation. Paired values of free cortisol levels obtained from direct measurement and from calculation were analysed to provide estimates of bias and precision for the two methods.

Outcome Measures: Free and total plasma cortisol and corticosteroid binding globulin concentrations.

Results: 102 samples were analysed. The overall bias was -17%± 50%, with 95% limits of agreement of - 115% to 80%. Bias was noted to be greater in specimens with higher albumin concentration, and was proportional to free cortisol concentration.

Conclusions: The observed bias between the two methods is of a magnitude that would be expected to produce clinically relevant discrepancies. Due to the proportional nature of the error, adding a correction factor is not feasible. Results obtained from using the Coolens method to calculate free cortisol concentration in acutely ill patients should be interpreted with caution.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

free cortisol
20
acutely ill
12
ill patients
12
cortisol acutely
8
coolens equation
8
direct measurement
8
free
6
cortisol
6
patients
5
comparison diagnostic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!