In the setting of acute myocardial infarction, decreases in early/late mortality, reocclusion after thrombolysis, and restenosis rate after percutaneous intervention are lower in smokers - this phenomenon has been designated as the 'smoker's paradox'. These benefits of smoking, however, are abrogated by stent placement. We hypothesized that fibrinolytic vulnerability would change in response to smoking, and that inhaled carbon monoxide may play a role. Smoking patients (n = 20, two cigarettes consumed within 90 min, average carboxyhemoglobin concentration of 5%) had plasma collected and normal individual (n = 20) plasma was also obtained. Thrombelastographic analyses conducted with addition of tissue-type plasminogen activator revealed that with the exception of the rate of thrombus generation, there was little difference in fibrinolytic kinetics between normal and smoking individuals. Addition of exogenous carbon monoxide resulted in diminished fibrinolytic response to the same extent in both groups. Subanalyses demonstrated that the smoking cohort had both hyperfibrinolytic and hypofibrinolytic patients as defined by confidence interval (5-95%) values generated from normal individuals. Addition of carbon monoxide reduced hyperfibrinolytic parameter values by 80% in smokers, whereas only a 17% decrease in hypofibrinolytic values changed. Our investigation suggests that 'smoker's paradox' involves a marked change in the character of the plasmin-antiplasmin-carbon monoxide interaction. Further investigation will be required to further define the molecular mechanism responsible for the 'smoker's paradox'.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835d53ec | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Ambient air pollution is a significant public health concern, known to affect cardiovascular health adversely. Research has identified both long-term and short-term cardiovascular risks associated with various air pollutants, including those linked to acute coronary syndromes. However, the observed effects are rather small, with most data sourced from highly polluted regions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
October 2024
Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine of Albacete, Neurophysiology & Behavior Lab, Institute of Biomedicine (IB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev
December 2024
Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
December 2024
Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Francis Medical Center, Monroe, LA, USA.
Scand J Public Health
July 2024
The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, The Netherlands.
Aims: Previous studies have reported a 'smoker's paradox', where people who smoke appear to be protected against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19). This conflicts with well-established evidence that people who smoke are generally more vulnerable to respiratory infections. In this study, we aimed to validate the association between smoking and SARS-CoV-2 infection in a general Dutch population, and to evaluate the evidence underlying the possible causal relationship between smoking and SARS-CoV-2 infection by applying a modern adaptation of the Bradford Hill criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!