In the setting of acute myocardial infarction, decreases in early/late mortality, reocclusion after thrombolysis, and restenosis rate after percutaneous intervention are lower in smokers - this phenomenon has been designated as the 'smoker's paradox'. These benefits of smoking, however, are abrogated by stent placement. We hypothesized that fibrinolytic vulnerability would change in response to smoking, and that inhaled carbon monoxide may play a role. Smoking patients (n = 20, two cigarettes consumed within 90 min, average carboxyhemoglobin concentration of 5%) had plasma collected and normal individual (n = 20) plasma was also obtained. Thrombelastographic analyses conducted with addition of tissue-type plasminogen activator revealed that with the exception of the rate of thrombus generation, there was little difference in fibrinolytic kinetics between normal and smoking individuals. Addition of exogenous carbon monoxide resulted in diminished fibrinolytic response to the same extent in both groups. Subanalyses demonstrated that the smoking cohort had both hyperfibrinolytic and hypofibrinolytic patients as defined by confidence interval (5-95%) values generated from normal individuals. Addition of carbon monoxide reduced hyperfibrinolytic parameter values by 80% in smokers, whereas only a 17% decrease in hypofibrinolytic values changed. Our investigation suggests that 'smoker's paradox' involves a marked change in the character of the plasmin-antiplasmin-carbon monoxide interaction. Further investigation will be required to further define the molecular mechanism responsible for the 'smoker's paradox'.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835d53ecDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

'smoker's paradox'
12
carbon monoxide
12
plasmin-antiplasmin-carbon monoxide
8
individuals addition
8
monoxide
5
smoking
5
divergent plasmin-antiplasmin-carbon
4
monoxide interactions
4
interactions young
4
young healthy
4

Similar Publications

Ambient air pollution is a significant public health concern, known to affect cardiovascular health adversely. Research has identified both long-term and short-term cardiovascular risks associated with various air pollutants, including those linked to acute coronary syndromes. However, the observed effects are rather small, with most data sourced from highly polluted regions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Systematic review and meta analysis of cross immunity and the smokers paradox in COVID19.

Sci Rep

October 2024

Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine of Albacete, Neurophysiology & Behavior Lab, Institute of Biomedicine (IB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.

Article Synopsis
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked interest in cross-immunity, revealing that T-cells from common cold coronaviruses could provide some protection against SARS-CoV-2.
  • There is a phenomenon called the "smoker's paradox" in COVID-19, where the rate of smokers in hospitalized patients is unexpectedly low, pointing to a complicated relationship between smoking and immune response.
  • A systematic review found that smoking prevalence is higher among patients infected with common cold coronaviruses than the general population, indicating urgent need for further research into these interactions and their biological mechanisms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focused on how smoking impacts outcomes for patients who experienced acute myocardial infarction (AMI), looking specifically at death rates over a follow-up period of about 1.14 years.
  • Among 1612 AMI patients, current smokers had a higher long-term mortality rate (56% more) compared to non-smokers, while ex-smokers had similar outcomes to non-smokers.
  • The findings suggest that active smoking leads to worse outcomes in terms of survival and earlier onset of heart-related issues, such as STEMI, compared to those who do not smoke.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Previous studies have reported a 'smoker's paradox', where people who smoke appear to be protected against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19). This conflicts with well-established evidence that people who smoke are generally more vulnerable to respiratory infections. In this study, we aimed to validate the association between smoking and SARS-CoV-2 infection in a general Dutch population, and to evaluate the evidence underlying the possible causal relationship between smoking and SARS-CoV-2 infection by applying a modern adaptation of the Bradford Hill criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!