Factors influencing the incidence of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT).

Vasc Endovascular Surg

VeinSolutions of North Suburban Boston, Stoneham, MA, USA.

Published: April 2013

Introduction: Extension of thrombus from the great saphenous vein into the common femoral vein can be an early postprocedural complication of endothermal ablation (ETA).

Methods: A retrospective review was performed over a 3-year period. Intraprocedural ultrasound images demonstrating the distance of the catheter tip to the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) were available for 519 procedures, and this distance was measured.

Results: Twenty-one (4.0%) cases of endovenous heat-induced thrombus (EHIT) were diagnosed. In all, 15 (6.4%) EHITs occurred following endovenous laser ablation and 6 (2.1%) after radiofrequency (P = .02). Distance from catheter tip to SFJ, vein diameter, concomitant treatments, and perioperative anticoagulation were not significant risk factors for EHIT. Of the clinical factors assessed, gender (P = .002), Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic and Pathophysiologic classification 3 to 6 (P = .003), history of prior thrombosis (P = .04), and Caprini thrombosis risk factor assessment score (P = .004) were significant. On multivariate analysis, Caprini score (P = .0002) and male gender (P = .0003) remained significant.

Conclusions: Male gender and increased Caprini score are predictive factors for EHIT following ETA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1538574413478494DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endovenous heat-induced
8
distance catheter
8
factors ehit
8
caprini score
8
male gender
8
factors
4
factors influencing
4
influencing incidence
4
incidence endovenous
4
heat-induced thrombosis
4

Similar Publications

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV) reflux after standard endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) vs. flush EVLA (fEVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

Methods: This was as randomised, single blind, controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register, NL5283).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To assess the safety and efficacy of flush endovenous laser ablation (fEVLA) in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a systematic review aiming to identify studies published from inception to March 2024 was conducted. The investigation covered single-arm studies and studies comparing fEVLA to standard EVLA (sEVLA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Blood flow from the saphenofemoral junction(SFJ) tributaries may cause recurrence of varicose veins. Flush occlusion is defined as the total occlusion of the great saphenous vein(GSV) right to the saphenofemoral junction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flush endovenous thermal ablation with saphenofemoral junction tributary occlusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study focused on the use of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) to treat recurrent varicose veins after small saphenous vein (SSV) surgery, analyzing its feasibility and initial results in 40 patients.
  • - Out of 45 EVLA procedures, there was a 97.8% immediate technical success rate, but 13.3% of limbs experienced further issues requiring additional treatment within a median follow-up period of 77 days.
  • - The majority of patients had complex vein anatomy, but no significant complications arose that required further medical intervention, demonstrating that EVLA is a promising option for managing recurrent varicose veins.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Tumescent anesthesia is linked to longer operation times and increased postoperative issues, prompting a study on tumescentless radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using an internal cooling system.
  • The research compared two patient groups: those receiving conventional tumescent anesthesia (50 patients) and those undergoing non-tumescent RFA (59 patients), finding significantly shorter operation times for the non-tumescent group.
  • Results showed no severe complications in either group, and postoperative pain and minor complications were comparable, suggesting that tumescentless RFA is a safer and more efficient option.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!