AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) for treating complex intracranial aneurysms in a multicenter trial.
  • A total of 108 patients with large and giant aneurysms participated, with a primary focus on achieving complete aneurysm occlusion and tracking major stroke or death at 180 days post-treatment.
  • Results showed 99.1% technical success, with 73.6% achieving the effectiveness endpoint and a relatively low safety event rate of 5.6%, indicating that PED is a viable option for these challenging cases.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; ev3/Covidien, Irvine, Calif) in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.

Materials And Methods: The Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms is a multicenter, prospective, interventional, single-arm trial of PED for the treatment of uncoilable or failed aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. Institutional review board approval of the HIPAA-compliant study protocol was obtained from each center. After providing informed consent, 108 patients with recently unruptured large and giant wide-necked aneurysms were enrolled in the study. The primary effectiveness endpoint was angiographic evaluation that demonstrated complete aneurysm occlusion and absence of major stenosis at 180 days. The primary safety endpoint was occurrence of major ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death at 180 days.

Results: PED placement was technically successful in 107 of 108 patients (99.1%). Mean aneurysm size was 18.2 mm; 22 aneurysms (20.4%) were giant (>25 mm). Of the 106 aneurysms, 78 met the study's primary effectiveness endpoint (73.6%; 95% posterior probability interval: 64.4%-81.0%). Six of the 107 patients in the safety cohort experienced a major ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death (5.6%; 95% posterior probability interval: 2.6%-11.7%).

Conclusion: PED offers a reasonably safe and effective treatment of large or giant intracranial internal carotid artery aneurysms, demonstrated by high rates of complete aneurysm occlusion and low rates of adverse neurologic events; even in aneurysms failing previous alternative treatments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120099DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uncoilable failed
12
failed aneurysms
12
pipeline uncoilable
8
aneurysms
8
aneurysms multicenter
8
internal carotid
8
carotid artery
8
108 patients
8
large giant
8
primary effectiveness
8

Similar Publications

Background: To report the 3-year safety and effectiveness of the Surpass Streamline flow diverter in the SCENT trial (Surpass Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial to Treat Large or Giant Wide-Neck Aneurysms).

Methods: The Surpass Streamline flow diverter device was evaluated in a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, non-randomized interventional trial including patients with uncoilable or previously treated but failed aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery. 3-year outcomes were tabulated with descriptive statistics and compared with 1-year outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The paraophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA) originates from the distal border of the cavernous ICA and terminates at the posterior communicating artery. Aneurysms arising from the paraophthalmic segment represent ~5-10% of intradural aneurysms. Due to the advent of endovascular treatment (EVT) techniques, specifically flow-diverting stents (FDSs), EVT has become a good option for these aneurysms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial primarily demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the implantation of multiple pipeline embolization devices (multi-PEDs) for large/giant intracranial aneurysms. However, no study has focused on when, why, or how to apply multi-PEDs.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the indications and strategies of using multi-PEDs for complex intracranial aneurysms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Predictors of the Effects of Flow Diversion in Very Large and Giant Aneurysms.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

June 2021

Department of Neurosurgery (J.H.C., Y.S.S.), Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine. Seoul, Republic of Korea

Background And Purpose: The treatment paradigm for very large and giant aneurysms has recently changed to flow diversion, in light of the results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms trial. However, the effects of flow diversion were definitely unknown. We explored this topic and identified the predictors of such effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In spite of the developing endovascular era, large (15-25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) wide-neck cerebral aneurysms remained technically challenging. Intracranial flow-diverting stents (FDS) were developed to address these challenges by targeting aneurysm hemodynamics to promote aneurysm occlusion. In 2011, the first FDS approved for use in the United States market.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!