AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the best timing for placing implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients post-myocardial infarction (MI) and whether this timing affects outcomes such as mortality and complications.
  • Analysis of data from nine clinical trials shows that patients receiving ICDs had lower mortality rates compared to those who did not, regardless of the timing of the implant after MI.
  • The research concludes that the timing of ICD implantation beyond 40 days after MI does not significantly influence its effectiveness or the occurrence of rehospitalizations and complications.

Article Abstract

Background: Whether there is an optimal time to place an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) more than 40 days after myocardial infarction (MI) in guideline-eligible patients is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of time from MI to randomization on mortality, rehospitalizations, and complications.

Methods: Individual data on patients enrolled in 9 primary prevention ICD trials were provided. Clinical trials were eligible for the current analysis if they enrolled patients with an MI more than 40 days prior to randomization to primary prevention ICD therapy vs usual care: Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial I, Multicenter UnSustained Tachyardia Trial, Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II, and Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.

Results: ICD recipients died less frequently than nonrecipients at 5 years across all subgroups of time from MI to randomization. In unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, a survival benefit was evident in most subgroups. Adjusted Bayesian Weibull survival modeling yielded hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% posterior credible interval (PCI) 0.20-1.25 41-180 days after MI; HR 0.98, 95% PCI 0.37-2.37 181-365 days after MI; HR 0.22, 95% PCI 0.07-0.59>1-2 years after MI; HR 0.42, 95% PCI 0.17-0.90>2-5 years after MI; HR 0.55, 95% PCI 0.25-1.15>5-10 years after MI; and HR 0.48, 95% PCI 0.20-1.02>10 years after MI. There was no evidence of an interaction between time from MI and all-cause mortality, rehospitalizations, or complications.

Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, there was scant evidence that the efficacy of primary prevention ICD therapy depends on time to implantation more than 40 days after MI. Similarly, there was no evidence that the risks of rehospitalizations or complications depend on time more than 40 days after MI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037291PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.02.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

95% pci
20
primary prevention
16
prevention icd
12
survival benefit
8
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
8
myocardial infarction
8
clinical trials
8
time randomization
8
mortality rehospitalizations
8
icd therapy
8

Similar Publications

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has allowed patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); they were previously ineligible.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of patients with OHCA secondary to AMI who underwent primary PCI during refractory cardiac arrest despite ECPR.

Methods: Patients with AMI and OHCA aged ≥18 years who underwent PCI with ECPR in 2013 to 2018 were identified from a multicenter ECPR registry in Japan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a frequent complication of coronary interventions associated with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity. The optimal intravenous hydration strategy to prevent CI-AKI is not well-established. The primary objective is to determine if a tailored hydration strategy reduces the risk of CI-AKI and of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing coronary angiography compared with a non-tailored hydration strategy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Coronary revascularisation deferral based on quantitative flow ratio or fractional flow reserve: a post hoc analysis of the FAVOR III Europe trial.

EuroIntervention

January 2025

Hospital Clínico San Carlos IDISSC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red - Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Background: Safe deferral of revascularisation is a key aspect of physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While recent evidence gathered in the FAVOR III Europe trial showed that quantitative flow ratio (QFR) guidance did not meet non-inferiority to fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance, it remains unknown if QFR might have a specific value in revascularisation deferral.

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the safety of coronary revascularisation deferral based on QFR as compared with FFR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Triglyceride glucose (TyG) index is a dependable indicator of IR, with numerous studies underscoring its influence on Cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, the connection between the TyG index and prognosis in AMI patients after PCI is still uncertain. This investigation aims to explore the link in individuals who have received PCI for AMI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Correlation between abnormal microvascular perfusion and quantitative flow ratio after primary PCI in patients with STEMI.

Int J Cardiol

December 2024

Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan, China. Electronic address:

Aims: Timely assessment of abnormal microvascular perfusion (MVP) may improve prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aimed to determine the clinical implications of contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio (cQFR) in evaluating abnormal MVP and subsequent outcomes among STEMI patients after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

Methods: The study population consisted of 2 independent cohorts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!