A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of proximal femoral bone support on the fixation of a press-fit noncemented total hip replacement femoral component. | LitMetric

Effect of proximal femoral bone support on the fixation of a press-fit noncemented total hip replacement femoral component.

J Appl Biomater Funct Mater

Implant Biomechanics Laboratory, The J. Vernon Luck, Sr. M.D. Orthopaedics Research Center, Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital, South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA - USA.

Published: June 2013

Purpose: Proximal femoral bone loss is a common challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. In this study, in-vitro fixation of a non-cemented, rectangular, dual-tapered, press-fit femoral component designed to achieve metadiaphyseal fixation was analyzed using an accelerated proximal femoral bone loss model to assess the potential use in revision cases.

Methods: The press-fit AlloclassicTM femoral stem was implanted in ten cadaveric femurs and tested under cyclic biomechanical loading in an intact state, and then again after sequential proximal femoral bone resections, simulating increasing amounts of bone deficiency. Anterior-posterior and medial-lateral interface motions were measured at the distal stem tip throughout loading. 


Results: Three specimens remained stable throughout testing, with initial and peak per-cycle motions of less than 50 μm. Six specimens were destabilized under loading with higher per-cycle motions, specifically at the distal stem tip during peak loading in the anterior-posterior direction, with motions of 78±69 μm, compared to 12±9 μm in the stable specimens (P<.05). Total migration of the destabilized specimens was also significantly higher, specifically at the proximal stem tip in the medial-lateral direction, with migrations of 101±34 μm (P<.05) and at the distal stem tip in the anterior-posterior direction, with migrations of 155±179 μm (P<.05), compared to 33±12 μm and 13±11 μm for the stable specimens.

Conclusion: The results indicate that when strong initial fixation is achieved, long-term success is possible given substantial proximal femoral bone loss.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/JABFM.2012.9682DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proximal femoral
16
femoral bone
16
femoral component
8
bone loss
8
distal stem
8
per-cycle motions
8
femoral
6
bone
5
proximal
4
bone support
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!