Objective: The optimal exposure interval for anteromedial coronoid fractures is unknown. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the osseous and ligamentous exposure of the medial elbow using the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)-Splitting and Hotchkiss Over-the-Top approaches.
Methods: Forty surgical approaches were performed on 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows using a randomized crossover design. Access to key anatomic landmarks [anteromedial facet, coronoid tip, sublime tubercle/anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (MCL), posterior bundle of the MCL, and radial head] was assessed. A calibrated digital image was taken from the surgeon's perspective of each approach, and these images were analyzed using a software program, ImageJ (NIH), to calculate the surface area of osseous structures exposed.
Results: The average surface area exposed was 3 times greater with the FCU-Splitting approach (13.3 cm) compared with the Hotchkiss Over-the-Top approach (4.4 cm) (P < 0.0001). All key anatomic landmarks were directly visualized with the FCU-Splitting approach in each specimen. Visualization of the sublime tubercle/anterior bundle of the MCL and posterior bundle of the MCL was unobtainable with the Hotchkiss approach in 17 (85%) and 20 (100%) specimens, respectively. There were no statistically significant correlations between exposure and sequence of dissection, specimen age, gender, or laterality.
Conclusions: The FCU-Splitting approach provides more extensive exposure of the anteromedial coronoid and proximal ulna and the medial ligamentous structures than the Hotchkiss Over-the-Top approach.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31828ba91c | DOI Listing |
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
March 2021
Hand and Upper Limb Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Purpose: Several surgical approaches to the medial elbow are described; however, it remains unclear which exposure provides the optimal view of relevant medial elbow structures. The purpose of this anatomic study was to determine the visible surface area of the coronoid process, distal humerus, and radial head through 5 approaches to the medial elbow.
Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremity specimens were dissected.
J Hand Surg Am
August 2016
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Purpose: To measure distances from anatomical landmarks to the median nerve, and estimate the length of the flexor-pronator/flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) detachment necessary to expose the anteromedial facet of the ulnar coronoid process (UCP) using the Hotchkiss over-the-top approach.
Methods: Dissections were made of 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper limbs. Measurements were made of the shortest distance from the medial epicondyle to the median nerve, the distance from the medial epicondyle to the median nerve in line with the flexor-pronator/FCU interval, the shortest distance from the apex of the UCP to the median nerve, and the length of the flexor-pronator/FCU detachment necessary to expose the anteromedial facet of the UCP.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
July 2015
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Background: The two most commonly used approaches to expose medial elbow structures are the flexor carpi ulnaris split and the Hotchkiss over-the-top approach. The aim of this study was to define the extended medial approach to the elbow, featuring advantages of over-the-top (proximal exposure) and additional complete exposure of the coronoid and proximal medial ulna, while respecting the internervous plane between the flexor pronator mass and flexor carpi ulnaris muscle.
Methods: In this comparative anatomic study, 12 fresh frozen cadaveric elbows were dissected alternately to study the distal limitation and exposed area of the extended medial elbow approach compared with splitting the flexor carpi ulnaris.
J Orthop Trauma
December 2013
*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX; †Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and ‡United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR), Fort Sam Houston, TX.
Objective: The optimal exposure interval for anteromedial coronoid fractures is unknown. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the osseous and ligamentous exposure of the medial elbow using the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)-Splitting and Hotchkiss Over-the-Top approaches.
Methods: Forty surgical approaches were performed on 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows using a randomized crossover design.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!