Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
To improve resolution power of chiral selector and enantiomeric peak efficiency in CE, single isomer negatively charged β-CD derivatives, mono(6-deoxy-6-sulfoethylthio)-β-CD (SET-β-CD) bearing one negative charge and mono[6-deoxy-6-(6-sulfooxy-5,5-bis-sulfooxymethyl)hexylthio]-β-CD (SMHT-β-CD) carrying three negative charges, were synthesized. The structure of these two β-CD derivatives was confirmed by (1)H NMR and MS. SET-β-CD and SMHT-β-CD successfully resolved the enantiomers of several basic model compounds. SMHT-β-CD provided for a significantly greater enantioseparation than SET-β-CD at lower concentrations. This appears to be due to the higher binding affinity of SMHT-β-CD to the model compounds and the wider separation window resulting from an increased countercurrent mobility of the selector. Overall, the new chiral selectors provided enantioseparations with high peak efficiency while avoiding peak distortion due to polydispersive and electrodispersive effects. The information obtained from an apparent binding constant study suggested that the enantioseparation of the model compounds followed the predictions of charged resolving agent migration model and that the observed degree of enantioseparation difference were due to the magnitude of differences in both enantiomer-chiral selector binding affinities (ΔK) and the mobilities of the complexed enantiomers (Δμ(c)).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201200591 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!