Validity and reliability of nerve and muscle ultrasound.

Muscle Nerve

Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Main Floor Reynolds Tower, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA.

Published: April 2013

Introduction: Nerve and muscle ultrasound has been studied in several conditions, but validity and reliability have not been assessed systematically.

Methods: Nerve cross-sectional area and muscle thickness were measured ultrasonographically at several sites in 4 cadavers, which were then dissected, and actual measurements were obtained. To assess intrarater and interrater reliability, between 3 and 5 ultrasonographers, with varying experience levels, made repeated measurements on healthy volunteers.

Results: Correlation coefficients for nerve and muscle validity were >0.968 (P < 0.001), and for intrarater reliability were >0.901 (P < 0.001) for still and real-time images. Correlation coefficients for interrater reliability were more varied, but for still images they were all significant at the P < 0.001 (0.542-0.998) level, and for real-time images they were significant at the P < 0.05 level for half the sites (0.243-0.981).

Conclusion: Overall, nerve and muscle ultrasound is a valid and reliable diagnostic imaging technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.23621DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nerve muscle
16
muscle ultrasound
12
validity reliability
8
interrater reliability
8
correlation coefficients
8
real-time images
8
nerve
5
muscle
5
reliability nerve
4
ultrasound introduction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!