AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the results of our method of surgical treatment of traumatic knee dislocation with injury to the posterolateral corner by use of a standardized protocol.

Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients presented with a grossly dislocated or reduced knee. Five of these patients were not included in this series. The remaining 20 patients were treated by primary arthroscopic reconstruction. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was reconstructed using gracilis tendon reinforced with artificial ligament (Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System [LARS] ligament); the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was reconstructed with semitendinosus tendon and reinforced with LARS ligament; and the posterolateral corner was treated using the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons from the uninjured knee. Twenty patients returned for subjective and objective evaluation at a minimum of 24 months after surgery. Early mobilization through continuous and active exercise was started on the fourth day postoperatively.

Results: At a mean follow-up of 44 months, the mean Lysholm score was 90 points, the mean score on the survey of daily activities was 90 points, and the sports activities score on the knee outcome survey averaged 80 points. By the rating of Meyers et al. the results were excellent in 6 patients, good in 10 patients, fair in 3 patients, and poor in one patient. The final International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) rating was not normal in any knee. The mean loss of extension was 2° (range, 0° to 3°) and loss of flexion was 12° (range, 10° to 15°).

Conclusions: By using the described method of arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments and the posterolateral corner, 80% of the patients had good subjective results and functional stability, and according to the IKDC scale, 45% of knees were nearly normal, 45% were abnormal, and 10% were severely abnormal. No patient's rating returned to normal.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

posterolateral corner
16
traumatic knee
8
knee dislocation
8
patients
8
cruciate ligament
8
tendon reinforced
8
patients good
8
knee
7
ligament
6
surgical management
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Fibular- and tibiofibular-based reconstructions are the gold standard treatment for posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee. This is the first report describing a wholly tibial-based PLC reconstruction.

Case Report: A 50-year-old female presented with knee instability following proximal fibular resection for a benign tumor, associated with chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency from a previous injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Surgical reconstruction is the standard treatment for injuries to the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee and can be performed using either a fibular-based or combined tibiofibular-based technique. Although some comparative studies have been performed, there is no consensus regarding the reconstructive approach that confers optimal biomechanical properties of the PLC.

Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the knee after PLC reconstruction with fibular-based and tibiofibular-based techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

With an estimated incidence of 0.02% to 0.2%, multiligamentous knee injuries are rare, often devastating injuries that can occur with concomitant vascular or neurologic involvement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: It is still unknown if the double-femoral tunnel technique (Arciero [ARC]) provides better stability as compared with the single-femoral tunnel technique (modified Larson [LAR]) in posterolateral corner reconstruction. The ideal angle of fixation of the popliteofibular strand in ARC is also unknown.

Hypotheses: The ARC provides greater external rotation (ER) stability than the LAR (hypothesis 1); there is no difference in varus rotation (VR) stability between LAR and ARC (hypothesis 2); and femoral fixation of the popliteofibular strand at 60° during the ARC leads to greater ER stability than fixation at 30° or 90° of knee flexion (hypothesis 3).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!