Background: The clinical benefit of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is unclear. This study aimed to assess the clinical burden of VTE and the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic prophylaxis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: Data sources and study selection studies were searched in MEDLINE and Embase using the terms "cholecystectomy and venous thrombosis" and "cholecystectomy and venous thromboembolism." Studies were considered for a systematic review and a metaanalysis if they reported on the methods of antithrombotic prophylaxis and on the incidence of objectively confirmed VTE in patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Overall, 15 studies of patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the systematic review.
Results: The incidence of VTE was lower after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than after open cholecystectomy [odds ratio (OR), 0.47; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.40-0.56]. No statistically significant reduction in VTE was observed in patients receiving heparin prophylaxis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OR, 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.12-5.82).
Conclusions: The rate of VTE after laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be relatively low. The clinical benefit of heparin prophylaxis for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains unclear.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2717-2 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
minimally invasive surgery is the surgery of the present and has become the "gold standard" for the most pathologies. The training of surgeons in minimally invasive techniques is mandatory required to be carried out during the residency program. In Romania, there is no national minimally invasive surgical training program, only universities and certain university hospitals are concerned with this aspect.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparative Assessment Between the Fundus-First Technique and Standard Laparoscopic Technique in Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Cureus
November 2024
Department of General Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a standard minimally invasive technique for the treatment in gallstone disease. In difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies, bailout strategies have been developed of which the fundus-first technique is one. The present study aims to compare the outcomes of the fundus-first technique against the standard laparoscopic approach in managing difficult cholecystectomy cases by focusing on intraoperative factors such as bleeding, bile duct injury, operative time, and postoperative complications like biliary leakage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRobotic versus Laparoscopic Emergency and Acute Care Surgery: Redefining Novelty (RLEARN): feasibility and benefit of robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis at a level 1 trauma center.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
December 2024
Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Background: This study aims to compare outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the setting of a level 1 trauma center.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of our hospital data (2021-2024) on patients who underwent LC or RC. Using a previously validated intraoperative grading system, four grades of cholecystitis were defined as mild (A), moderate (B), severe (C), and extreme (D).
Gallbladder perforation causing local peritonitis in left upper abdomen: A case report.
Int J Surg Case Rep
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Introduction And Importance: Type 1 gallbladder perforation (GBP) in the free abdominal cavity causes pan-peritonitis, which is both rare and difficult to diagnose.
Case Presentation: An 80-year-old man presented to our hospital with acute left upper abdominal pain. Twenty days prior to presentation, he had been admitted for 12 days with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Endoscopic resection of a giant irregular leiomyoma in fundus and cardia: A case report.
World J Gastrointest Endosc
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, Central Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China.
Background: Endoscopic resection of giant gastric leiomyomas, particularly in the fundus and cardia regions, is infrequently documented and presents a significant challenge for endoscopic surgery.
Case Summary: Herein, a case of a 59-year-old woman with a giant gastric leiomyoma was reported. The patient presented to the department of hepatological surgery with a complaint of right upper abdominal pain for one month and worsening for one week.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!