The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device.

Eur Spine J

Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center, St. Lucas-Andreas Ziekenhuis, Jan Tooropstaat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Published: May 2013

Purpose: With lumbar discectomy for disc herniation, surgeons must choose between limited nucleus removal associated with higher reherniation risk or more aggressive nucleus removal associated with increased back pain and disc degeneration. This trade-off is particularly challenging in patients with large anular defects, which carry the highest risk of reherniation. We examined the effect of an anular closure device on reherniation and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Seventy-five primary discectomy patients had a limited discectomy followed by implantation of an anular closure device and were followed-up to 2 years. Anular defect size and volume of removed nucleus was recorded at surgery. Reherniations were reported, pain and function were monitored throughout, and imaging was performed at annual visits.

Results: The overall symptomatic reherniation rate was 1.4%, and the asymptomatic reherniation rate was 1.5% at 12 months and 5.1% at 24 months. Both rates compare favorably with literature reports which include symptomatic rates ranging between 2 and 18% (up to 27% for patients with large anular defects) and an asymptomatic rate of 13%.

Conclusions: The low reherniation rate in patients at high-risk of reherniation based on anular defect size, despite discectomy being only limited, suggests that an anular closure device may reduce reherniation risk. Clinical outcomes for pain and function at 1 and 2 years post-operatively compared favorably with literature reports. Further study in a randomized controlled trial is required to confirm these results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657060PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2656-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anular closure
16
closure device
16
patients large
12
large anular
12
anular defects
12
reherniation rate
12
reherniation
9
anular
9
nucleus removal
8
removal associated
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To examine the results of an anular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in daily routine practice.

Methods: Fifty patients with large anular defects were treated with limited discectomy and a bone-anchored anular closure device. The device physically occludes the defect in the anulus fibrosus and is intended for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The purposes of the present study were to (1) confirm the risk of recurrent lumbar disc herniation in patients with a large anular defect who had undergone limited discectomy and (2) assess potential risk factors within this population.

Methods: The patient population was extracted from the control cohort of a prospective, randomized, multicenter controlled trial investigating the efficacy of an anular closure device following standard limited discectomy. All control patients underwent limited discectomy for the treatment of a single-level symptomatic posterior or posterolateral lumbar disc herniation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

JBJS Essent Surg Tech

December 2016

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion can be performed for a variety of pathologies but is most commonly used for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. The procedure involves an anterior decompression of the disc space followed by interbody grafting and fusion. Supplemental anterior plating is commonly performed, and in certain circumstances, posterior instrumentation may provide additional fixation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sequestrectomy alone represents a procedure for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. For selected cases, an anulus closure device (ACD) can be implanted which may result in lower reoperation rates. However, comparative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes and their clinical relevance of both procedures are unclear and have not been reported so far.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!