A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@remsenmedia.com&api_key=81853a771c3a3a2c6b2553a65bc33b056f08&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cognitive motor interference during dual-task gait in essential tremor. | LitMetric

Cognitive motor interference during dual-task gait in essential tremor.

Gait Posture

Program in Physical Therapy and G.H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Published: July 2013

Background: Functional ambulation requires concurrent performance of motor and cognitive tasks, which may create interference (degraded performance) in either or both tasks. People with essential tremor (ET) demonstrate impairments in gait and cognitive function. In this study we examined the extent of interference between gait and cognition in people with ET and controls during dual-task gait.

Methods: We tested 62 controls and 151 ET participants (age range: 72-102). ET participants were divided into two groups based on median score on the modified Mini Mental State Examination. Participants walked at their preferred speed, and performed a verbal fluency task while walking. We analyzed gait velocity, cadence, stride length, double support time, stride time, step width, step time difference, coefficient of variation (CV) of stride time and stride length.

Results: Verbal fluency performance during gait was similar across groups (p=0.68). Velocity, cadence and stride length were lowest whereas step time difference (p=0.003), double support time (p=0.009), stride time (p=0.002) and stride time CV (p=0.007) were highest for ET participants with lower cognitive scores (ETp-LCS), compared with ET participants with higher cognitive scores (ETp-HCS) and controls. ETp-LCS demonstrated greatest interference for double support time (p=0.005), step time difference (p=0.013) and stride time coefficient of variation (p=0.03).

Conclusions: ETp-LCS demonstrated high levels of cognitive motor interference. Gait impairments during complex tasks may increase risk for falls for this subgroup and underscore the importance of clinical assessment of gait under simple and dual-task conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679258PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stride time
20
double support
12
support time
12
step time
12
time difference
12
time
11
cognitive motor
8
motor interference
8
essential tremor
8
interference gait
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!