Context: Implementation of proficiency testing for gynecologic cytology was delayed 20 years because of challenges addressing the subjective nature of cytologic interpretation and replicating normal working conditions. Concern remains regarding test scoring, slide validation, test environment, and other issues. How these test results are, or should be, used in quality management has never been explored.

Objective: To provide information on good laboratory practices for gynecologic cytology proficiency testing based on findings from the College of American Pathologists' survey-based project funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Data Sources: An expert working group evaluated results from a Web-based, national laboratory survey plus responses from follow-up questions and findings from the literature. The group created statements on good laboratory practices pertinent to proficiency testing and its role in quality management, which were discussed and voted on at a consensus conference.

Conclusions: Two-thirds of laboratories report having an individual with an unsuccessful proficiency testing score. More than 90% did not initiate any remedial action for 1 or 2 unsuccessful tests; 84% of laboratories reported they actively monitored results from proficiency testing, but most laboratories did not initiate any remedial action for cytotechnologists (81.4%; 376 of 462) or pathologists (87.7%; 405 of 462) who passed a proficiency test but who did not score 100%. Proficiency testing pass-fail rates should be monitored globally for the laboratory and for each individual. Proficiency testing slides should be prescreened by cytotechnologists for pathologists who are not primary screeners. Remedial action should not be required for a passed, but imperfect, test. No remedial action is required for an unsuccessful, first proficiency test result before retesting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0094-OADOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proficiency testing
32
remedial action
16
proficiency
9
testing
8
findings college
8
college american
8
working group
8
gynecologic cytology
8
quality management
8
good laboratory
8

Similar Publications

Background: It is necessary and challenging to establish reasonable and feasible total error specifications for coagulation factor assays for quality control and assessment. The aim of this study is to establish new total error specifications for coagulation factor assays by combining External Quality Assessment data with reliable biological variation data.

Methods: Data from China National External Quality Assessment Scheme (28,408 results from 1,381 laboratories) were analyzed, stratifying External Quality Assessment data by reference intervals to establish concentration-dependent total error specifications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Disparate Use of Diagnostic Modalities for Patients With Limited English Proficiency and Neurologic Disorders.

Neurol Clin Pract

April 2025

Department of Neurology (AS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (RBAB), University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School; Harvard Medical School (DH, SW), Boston; and City University of New York at Hunter College (DH, SW).

Background And Objectives: Limited English proficiency (LEP) impairs health access-including outpatient specialty care-and quality care, i.e., inappropriate use of diagnostic tests.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Context.—: The College of American Pathologists Hematology and Clinical Microscopy Committee implemented a hemoglobinopathy proficiency testing and education program to monitor and assess the performance of participating laboratories.

Objective.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly strained healthcare systems globally, leading to an overwhelming influx of patients and exacerbating resource limitations. Concurrently, an "infodemic" of misinformation, particularly prevalent in women's health, has emerged. This challenge has been pivotal for healthcare providers, especially gynecologists and obstetricians, in managing pregnant women's health.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!