A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of horizontal rectus muscles in esotropia. | LitMetric

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of horizontal rectus muscles in esotropia.

J AAPOS

Jules Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7002,USA.

Published: February 2013

Purpose: Monkey neurophysiology suggests that changes in neural drive rather than extraocular muscle structure underlie sensory-induced strabismus. If this is true, then extraocular muscle structure should be normal. We used magnetic resonance imaging to measure horizontal rectus muscle size and contractility to determine whether muscle structure is a factor in human concomitant esotropia.

Methods: High-resolution, quasicoronal plane magnetic resonance imaging was performed in target-controlled central gaze, abduction, and adduction in 13 orthotropic controls (mean age, 38 ± 19 years) and 12 adults (mean age, 52 ± 16 years) who had concomitant esotropia averaging 28(Δ) ± 18(Δ) at distance. Thyroid ophthalmopathy was excluded. Horizontal rectus muscle cross sections were determined in 6 contiguous, 2-mm-thick midorbital image planes. Contractility was computed in each plane as the difference in cross section from contraction to relaxation.

Results: Medial rectus muscle cross sections in multiple planes averaged up to 39% larger in esotropic patients than in controls (P < 0.005), whereas lateral rectus muscle cross sections in esotropia were up to 28% larger but only significantly larger in one plane (P < 0.02). Medial rectus contractility was increased by up to 60% in esotropic patients (P < 0.005), whereas lateral rectus contractility in esotropia was slightly but not significantly supernormal.

Conclusions: Medial rectus muscle size is supernormal and lateral rectus muscle size is not subnormal in concomitant esotropia. This finding indicates that human concomitant esotropia is associated with peripheral muscular abnormality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3976672PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

magnetic resonance
12
resonance imaging
12
horizontal rectus
12
muscle structure
12
rectus muscle
12
extraocular muscle
8
muscle cross
8
cross sections
8
muscle
6
functional magnetic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!