Introduction: The Sernbo score uses four factors (age, social situation, mobility and mental state) to divide patients into a high-risk and a low-risk group. This study sought to assess the use of the Sernbo score in predicting mortality after an intracapsular hip fracture.

Methods: A total of 259 patients with displaced intracapsular hip fractures were included in the study. Data from prospectively generated databases provided 22 descriptive variables for each patient. These included operative management, blood tests and co-mobidities. Multivariate analysis was used to identify significant predictors of mortality.

Results: The mean patient age was 85 years and the mean follow-up duration was 1.5 years. The one-year survival rate was 92% (± 0.03) in the low-risk group and 65% (± 0.046) in the high-risk group. Four variables predicted mortality: Sernbo score >15 (p=0.0023), blood creatinine (p=0.0026), ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) grade >3 (p=0.0038) and non-operative treatment (p=0.0377). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the Sernbo score as the only predictor of 30-day mortality (area under curve 0.71 [0.65-0.76]). The score had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 51% for prediction of death at 30 days.

Conclusions: The Sernbo score identifies patients at high risk of death in the 30 days following injury. This very simple score could be used to direct extra early multidisciplinary input to high-risk patients on admission with an intracapsular hip fracture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964633PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609954653DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sernbo score
24
intracapsular hip
16
hip fracture
8
low-risk group
8
score
7
sernbo
6
score predicts
4
predicts survival
4
intracapsular
4
survival intracapsular
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Frailty is common among patients with hip fracture and may, in part, contribute to the increased risk of mortality and morbidity after hip fracture surgery. This study aimed to develop a novel frailty score for patients with traumatic hip fracture that could be used to predict postoperative mortality as well as facilitate further research into the role of frailty in patients with hip fracture.

Methods: The Orthopedic Hip Frailty Score (OFS) was developed using a national dataset, retrieved from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Hip Fractures, that contained all adult patients who underwent surgery for a traumatic hip fracture in Sweden between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2017.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A combined fracture and mortality risk index useful for treatment stratification in hip fragility fractures.

Jt Dis Relat Surg

November 2021

Aksaray Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 68200 Aksaray, Türkiye.

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to assess the stratification ability of the Fracture and Mortality Risk Evaluation (FAME) index for reoperation, new fragility fracture, and mortality during one-year follow-up.

Patients And Methods: Between November 2018 and July 2019, a total of 94 consecutive hip fragility fracture patients from two centers (20 males, 74 females; mean age: 79.3±8.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures at a Sub-Saharan Academic Hospital.

SICOT J

May 2021

Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Hospital, University of Witwatersrand, 2000 Johannesburg, South Africa.

Background: Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) remain "the unsolved fracture" and optimal management is still controversial. The outcomes of hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of FNFs are inconsistent. As demand for management of FNFs continues to grow globally, evaluation of the appropriateness of treatment remains essential, particularly in resource-constrained settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of the survivorship between arthroplasty and ORIF for basi-cervical femoral neck fractures in the overall population and in polymorbid patients.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

May 2021

Orthopaedic and traumatology unit, Ospedale regionale di Lugano, EOC, Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland (CH).

Article Synopsis
  • Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) have high mortality rates and can be treated with either arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), but there is no consensus on which method is superior for survival outcomes.
  • A study analyzed 154 patients who underwent arthroplasty and 72 who underwent ORIF, revealing no significant difference in overall survival rates or hospital stay lengths, although complications were higher in the arthroplasty group.
  • The findings suggest that while both procedures are viable for treating basi-cervical FNFs, arthroplasty may be preferable for patients with higher comorbidities, indicating a need for careful consideration based on patients' health status.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Patients sustaining a hip fracture have a high mortality rate during the first postoperative year and the Sernbo score may stratify patients into a high, intermediate and low risk of death during this period. We assessed its predictive properties on patients from the National Swedish Hip Fracture Register.

Patients And Methods: 55,716 hip fracture patients, 69% women older than 65 years at surgery (registered between 2010 and 2015) with complete Sernbo scores and mortality data were studied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!