Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of fractures and incidental findings (IF) with emphasis on clinical significance.

Materials And Methods: A total of 784 patients were evaluated by computed tomography. Fractures and IF were registered and classified as significant if they were recommended for additional diagnostics or therapy.

Results: Four hundred seventy of 784 patients (60%) sustained a fracture. Significant fractures were found in 694/1213 fractures (57%); nonsignificant fractures were found in 519/1213 (43%) fractures. A total of 972 IF were observed in 464/784 (59%) patients. Significant findings were found in 358/972 findings (37%). There were 1.5 fractures and 1.2 IF per patient.

Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of significant fractures (57%) and IF (37%).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.11.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computed tomography
8
fractures
8
prevalence fractures
8
784 patients
8
fractures 57%
8
current perspective
4
perspective multidetector
4
multidetector computed
4
tomography mdct
4
patients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!