Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Category induction involves abstraction of features common to two or more stimuli. Event-related potentials (ERPs) during induction and non-induction tasks were recorded for 12 children and 12 adults. We found that (1) ERP waves, except P2 amplitude, decreased significantly with age, (2) Compared to non-induction tasks, induction tasks elicited larger fronto-central N2 components in both age groups, (3) The amplitude of the late positive component was significantly greater in the induction condition than in the non-induction condition, and (4) The difference wave suggested that category induction was mainly located in the left hemisphere in children but was not lateralized in adults.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2012.721420 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!