AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis were analyzed to understand survival rates based on preoperative ejection fractions (EFs) and accompanying procedures like coronary artery bypass grafting.
  • Out of 5,277 patients studied from 1992 to 2008, 14% had EFs below 40%, but preoperative EF had little impact on short-term morbidity or 30-day mortality, especially for those with isolated AVR.
  • Results highlighted that patients with preserved EFs before surgery had better long-term survival, indicating that AVR should ideally be performed before any significant decline in myocardial function occurs.

Article Abstract

Background: The survival of patients who undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis with reduced preoperative ejection fractions (EFs) is not well described in the literature.

Methods And Results: Patients undergoing AVR for severe aortic stenosis were analyzed using the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group surgical registry. Patients were stratified by preoperative EF (≥50%, 40%-49%, and <40%) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Crude and adjusted survival across strata of EF was estimated for patients up to 8 years beyond their index admission. A total of 5277 patients underwent AVR for severe aortic stenosis between 1992 and 2008. There were 727 (14%) patients with preoperative EF <40%. Preoperative EF had minimal effect on postoperative morbidity. There was no difference in 30-day mortality across EF strata among the isolated AVR cohort. Preserved EF conferred 30-day survival benefit among the AVR+coronary artery bypass grafting population (EF≥50%, 96%; EF<40%, 91%; P=0.003). Patients with preserved EF had significantly improved 6-month and 8-year survival compared with their reduced EF counterparts.

Conclusions: Survival after AVR or AVR+coronary artery bypass grafting was most favorable among patients with preoperative preserved EF. However, patients with mild to moderately depressed EF experienced a substantial survival benefit compared with the natural history of medically treated patients. Furthermore, minor reductions of EF carried equivalent increased risk to those with more compromised function suggesting patients are best served when an AVR is performed before even minor reductions in myocardial function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965772DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aortic stenosis
12
aortic valve
8
valve replacement
8
avr severe
8
severe aortic
8
aortic
5
impact preoperative
4
preoperative left
4
left ventricular
4
ventricular ejection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!