A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

CT analysis of fat distribution superficial and deep to the Scarpa's fascial layer in the mid and lower abdomen. | LitMetric

CT analysis of fat distribution superficial and deep to the Scarpa's fascial layer in the mid and lower abdomen.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Plastic Surgery Dept., Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK.

Published: April 2013

Introduction: Mismatches in the thickness of subcutaneous fat at the level of the umbilicus and suprapubic region can result in an unsightly bulge and an unfavourable result following standard abdominoplasty. This problem can be avoided by thinning the abdominoplasty flap. This study was carried out to assess the thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer at the level of the umbilicus and the supra-pubic region. Measurements of full thickness fat and the depth of Scarpa's fascia separating superficial and sub-Scarpa fat layers were taken from the CT scans in 69 women; mean age 52 years (range 30-79).

Results: The thickness of the skin and abdominal wall fat was an average of 7 mm thicker (max 22 mm; p << 0.05). The thickness of the fat layer superficial to Scarpa's fascia was an average of 19 mm at mid abdomen and 22 mm in the lower abdomen (p << 0.05). The thickness of the fat layer deep to Scarpa's fascia was 14 mm in the mid abdomen and 5 mm in the lower abdomen (p << 0.05). In 55% of patients the difference in thickness of the mid abdominal and lower abdominal fat was greater than 5 mm, a difference that could lead to a noticeable mismatch and therefore an unfavourable outcome.

Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that selectively thinning the fat layer deep to Scarpa's fascia would address potential mismatches and preserve the Scarpa's fascia layer in more than 50% of cases, therefore allowing wounds to be closed with an effective deep tension layer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.12.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thickness subcutaneous
8
subcutaneous fat
8
level umbilicus
8
fat
5
analysis fat
4
fat distribution
4
distribution superficial
4
superficial deep
4
deep scarpa's
4
scarpa's fascial
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!