1. Human subjects made discrete elbow flexions in a horizontal plane over different distances, from a stationary initial position to a visually defined stationary target 9 degrees wide. We measured joint angle, acceleration, and electromyograms (EMGs) from two agonist and two antagonist muscles. 2. Subjects made movements over four different distances following one of four different instructions. The first instructed the subject simply to choose a comfortable speed. The other three explicitly emphasized either speed, accuracy, or maintenance of the "same" speed over different distances. These instructions produced a wide range of movement velocities. 3. The initial rises of the acceleration (and therefore of the inertial torque), as well as the initial slope of the agonist EMG, were all invariant over changes in the target distance for any single instruction but were all sensitive to the given instruction. 4. Our results demonstrate that the speed-insensitive strategy is a standard or default pattern for performing movements that may be carried out for different instructions over a wide range of speeds. A uniform intensity of excitation pulse is not a byproduct of moving at maximal speed. Submaximal intensities are associated with submaximal speeds and are a selected feature of the pattern of movement control.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1990.63.3.625 | DOI Listing |
Exp Brain Res
January 1999
School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Two experiments are reported that investigated the effects of target size and inertial load on the control of rapid aiming movements. Based on kinematic profiles, movements were partitioned into their preprogrammed initial impulse- and feedback-based error correction phases. Electromyographic (EMG) rise rates were examined to investigate whether participants used a speed-sensitive or speed-insensitive control strategy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExp Brain Res
October 1998
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610, USA.
Movements have been described as being governed by a speed-sensitive (SS) or speed-insensitive (SI) strategy. The SS strategy is used when the subject controls, either explicitly or implicitly, movement speed or time. In contrast, the SI strategy is utilized when there is no intention or requirement to control movement speed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurophysiol
October 1998
Boston University, Neuromuscular Research Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
We examined the systematic variations in the EMG patterns during two types of single joint elbow movements. These patterns may be interpreted as exhibiting rules by which the CNS controls movement parameters. Normal human subjects performed two series of fast elbow flexion movements of 20-100 degrees in a horizontal plane manipulandum.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiol Cybern
September 1995
Department of Physiology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
There is a no unique relationship between the trajectory of the hand, represented in cartesian or extrinsic space, and its trajectory in joint angle or intrinsic space in the general condition of joint redundancy. The goal of this work is to analyze the relation between planning the trajectory of a multijoint movement in these two coordinate systems. We show that the cartesian trajectory can be planned based on the task parameters (target coordinates, etc.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurophysiol
June 1992
Department of Physiology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois 60612.
1. Normal human subjects made discrete elbow flexions in the horizontal plane under different task conditions of initial or final position, inertial loading, or instruction about speed. We measured joint angle, acceleration, and electromyographic signals (EMGs) from two agonist and two antagonist muscles.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!