Objective: To evaluate the pharmaceutical equivalence of a test formulation (fixed-dose combination of budesonide and formoterol fumarate in a single capsule dispensed in an Aerocaps® inhaler) in relation to a reference formulation (budesonide and formoterol fumarate in two separate capsules dispensed in an Aerolizer® inhaler).

Methods: This was an in vitro study in which we performed the identification/quantification of the active ingredients by HPLC and determined dose uniformity and aerodynamic particle size distribution in the test and reference formulations.

Results: In the test formulation, the content of budesonide and formoterol was 111.0% and 103.8%, respectively, compared with 110.5% and 104.5%, respectively, in the reference formulation. In the test formulation, dose uniformity regarding budesonide and formoterol was 293.2 µg and 10.2 µg, respectively, whereas it was 353.0 µg and 11.1 µg in the reference formulation. These values are within the recommended range for this type of formulation (75-125% of the labeled dose). The fine particle fraction (< 5 µm) for budesonide and formoterol was 45% and 56%, respectively, in the test formulation and 54% and 52%, respectively, in the reference formulation.

Conclusions: For both of the formulations tested, the levels of active ingredients, dose uniformity, and aerodynamic diameters were suitable for use with the respective dry powder inhalers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37132012000600010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

budesonide formoterol
24
test formulation
16
reference formulation
12
dose uniformity
12
formulation
9
pharmaceutical equivalence
8
formulation budesonide
8
single capsule
8
dry powder
8
formoterol fumarate
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with exacerbations which can reduce quality of life and increase mortality. Single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) is recommended for maintenance treatment of COPD among patients experiencing exacerbations despite dual-therapy use. This real-world comparative effectiveness study compared the impact of SITTs, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI), and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FORM), on COPD exacerbations and mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We evaluated the inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) versus dual LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA therapies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and phenotypic features of asthma (bronchodilator reversibility and elevated blood eosinophils), but no asthma diagnosis, for whom treatment guidelines are limited.

Patients And Methods: KRONOS (NCT02497001) and ETHOS (NCT02465567) enrolled patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, no current asthma diagnosis, and either ≥0 (KRONOS) or ≥1 (ETHOS) moderate/severe exacerbations in the prior year. This pooled post hoc analysis evaluated trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) and FEV area under the curve from hours 0 to 4 (AUC) change from baseline over 12-24 weeks, moderate/severe exacerbation rates, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score over 24 weeks with ICS/LAMA/LABA (BGF 320/14.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: In Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) widespread transition to budesonide/formoterol maintenance and/or reliever regimens in clinical practice is temporally associated with reduced rates of asthma hospitalization. It is unknown whether this association is observed in Māori, the indigenous population of NZ, who experience a disproportionate burden from asthma. We investigated patterns in asthma medication use and hospital admissions in Māori in NZ.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study examines how well patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) stick to their medication regimens, comparing a single daily inhaler (FF/UMEC/VI) to a combination that requires two inhalations twice a day (BUD/GLY/FOR).
  • Using insurance claims data from 2019 to 2023, researchers evaluated adherence (how often patients take their medication) and persistence (how long they continue treatment), with a total of 11,597 COPD patients involved.
  • Results showed that patients using the single inhaler (FF/UMEC/VI) had better adherence and persistence over 6 and 12 months compared to those using the combination
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!