A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Screening for glaucoma: rationale and strategies. | LitMetric

Screening for glaucoma: rationale and strategies.

Curr Opin Ophthalmol

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0715, USA.

Published: March 2013

Purpose Of Review: Late diagnosis of glaucoma is a leading factor in vision loss associated with this disease. Screening programs seek to diagnose glaucoma at an earlier, more treatable stage. Our purpose was to review the influence of screening location and testing strategies in glaucoma screening.

Recent Findings: Screening high-risk groups appears effective, although general population-based screening programs have not been cost effective. Community-based screening programs have achieved limited success due to lack of follow-up of screened patients. High-risk patients often do not present for office-based screening programs. Screening strategies that employ a single test or few tests are generally more effective compared with strategies using multiple tests, due to avoidance of false positives. Compared with currently available screening tests, frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry has shown higher sensitivity and specificity. Recent evidence suggests that automated assessment of the optic nerve and retinal nerve fiber layer may be superior to FDT perimetry, but the techniques remain unproven in screening settings.

Summary: Community-based screening of high-risk groups with functional testing using FDT perimetry can be effective, but newer automated structural measurements of the optic nerve and retinal nerve fiber layer may allow improved glaucoma screening sensitivity and specificity in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835cf078DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening programs
16
screening
12
fdt perimetry
12
purpose review
8
screening high-risk
8
high-risk groups
8
community-based screening
8
sensitivity specificity
8
optic nerve
8
nerve retinal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!