Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Two hundred thirty consecutive cases of presumed infectious keratitis were reviewed. Cultures were positive in 49.5% (114 of 230). Acridine orange stain sensitivity (81%) was significantly greater than gram stain sensitivity (65%) (p less than 0.002). Gram stain specificity was 92%, and acridine orange specificity was 89%. In keratitis with low or moderate growth, acridine orange was positive in 73% (61 of 84) as compared with Gram stain 53% (45 of 84), (p less than 0.001). In cases of heavy microbial growth, Gram stain was positive in 97% (29 of 30), acridine orange in 100% (30 of 30). This study demonstrates that both Gram stain and acridine orange stain are excellent in cases of infectious keratitis with heavy microbial growth, but that acridine orange is significantly better than Gram stain in cases with low amounts of organisms.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!