A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of X-ray Protection Methods Used in Dental Offices in Tabriz in 2005-2006. | LitMetric

Evaluation of X-ray Protection Methods Used in Dental Offices in Tabriz in 2005-2006.

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects

Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Published: January 2013

Background And Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate x-ray protection methods in dental offices in Tabriz.

Materials And Methods: In this study 142 dental offices were evaluated. A questionnaire-based method was used. The data was analyzed by descriptive methods.

Results: The least commonly used methods were leaded walls (4.9%) and film badges (16.9%) and the most commonly used methods were lead partitions (67.6%) and position-distance rule (68.3%). The most commonly used patient protection devices were E-speed films (84.5%) and long collimators (66.2%). The least commonly used methods, in this respect, were automatic processors (2.1%) and rectangular collimators (0%).

Conclusion: Regarding protection methods for the patient, results did not conform to international standards. Mostly, manual processing was used, resulting in extra radiation dose to patients. The methods which reduce the received dose of patients were disregarded in offices compared to educational centers, necessitating optimization of educational programs in these fields.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3522909PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2007.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

protection methods
12
dental offices
12
commonly methods
12
x-ray protection
8
methods
8
methods dental
8
dose patients
8
evaluation x-ray
4
protection
4
offices
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!