A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The value of diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in the diagnosis of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis. | LitMetric

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and differentiation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis cases, with histopathologic correlation.

Materials And Methods: Sixty consecutive patients (34 males, 26 females; mean age, 35.6±15.5 years; range, 17-83 years) with a presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis were included in this prospective study. With a 1.5 Tesla MRI unit, DW-MRI examinations were performed with b values of 50, 400, and 800 s/mm(2). The mean ADC values of case and control groups, as well as in perforated and nonperforated groups were compared.

Results: Of the 60 cases, 44 had a radiological diagnosis of acute appendicitis, and 16 were regarded as normal. Of the 40 patients who underwent surgical operation, 12 had a histopathological diagnosis of perforated appendicitis, and 28 had nonperforated appendicitis. Mean ADC value in patients with acute appendicitis (1.01±0.26×10(-3) mm(2)/s) was lower than the control group (1.85±0.13×10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < 0.001). Mean ADC value of the perforated group (0.79±0.19×10(-3) mm(2)/s) was lower than the nonperforated group (1.11±0.22×10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy rate of DW-MRI in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were 97.5%, 100%, 97.5%, 100%, and 98.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: DW-MRI and ADC quantification are effective in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, both in perforated and nonperforated cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.6070-12.1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acute appendicitis
24
diagnosis acute
20
perforated nonperforated
16
nonperforated appendicitis
12
appendicitis
10
apparent diffusion
8
diffusion coefficient
8
diagnosis perforated
8
adc values
8
mm2/s lower
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!