Objectives: The use of transpedicular screw fixation has been widely accepted for the treatment of degenerative and traumatic pathology of the lumbar spine. Complications of spinal instrumentation can be serious. Screw misplacement can result in unintended durotomy, nerve root and/or cauda equina injury. In comparison to fluoroscopy-assisted screw placement, computer-assisted image guidance has been shown to achieve overall higher rates of accuracy. The O-arm is able to obtain computed tomography (CT)-type images with multiplanar reconstruction. In this study we evaluated a cohort of patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws utilizing the O-arm imaging system.
Methods: A retrospective review of 40 consecutive patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery with O-arm utilization, was performed. The study population included 14 males and 26 females. Age range was 39-85 years with an average of 63.8 years. Twenty one patients had degenerative lumbar stenosis (52.5%) and 19 had spondylolisthesis (47.5%). Intraoperative CT-images were obtained. The mean time for surgery and screw placement was assessed.
Results: A total of 252 pedicle screws were sited using O-arm navigation system, with a mean of 6.3 screws per patient (range 4-10). On the basis of intraoperative CT, 3 screws were redirected, representing a 98.81% accuracy rate. The mean duration of surgery was 157.2 (90-240) minutes and the mean time for screw placement was 7.13 (3.08-15) minutes per screw. Three patients (7.5%) developed superficial wound infections which were treated conservatively. No patients required a return to the operating room because of screw malposition.
Conclusion: The use of intraoperative O-arm imaging system with computer-assisted navigation significantly increases the surgical accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusion surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucir.2012.09.006 | DOI Listing |
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Objective: Controversy exists regarding treatment of symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis (LGS). Both one- and two-stage fusions are commonly performed, but it is unclear if one approach is superior. We aim to compare the satisfaction rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with LGS undergoing one- versus two-stage lumbar spine surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The objective of this study was to assess the complicated relationship between frailty, perioperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) undergoing lumbar spine fusion (LSF).
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent LSF between March 2019 and December 2021 were recruited in this study. Frail patients (modified frailty index [mFI] score ≥ 2) were propensity score matched to nonfrail patients (mFI score 0-1) on the basis of age, sex, and the number of fused levels.
Eur Spine J
January 2025
Departments of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Purpose: This study aimed at comparing the costs of spinal fusion surgery between patients with and without diabetes.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of four databases was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed on comparative studies examining diabetic versus non-diabetic adults undergoing cervical/lumbar fusion in terms of cost.
Global Spine J
January 2025
Department of orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Global Spine J
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!