Background: The number of patients undergoing resternotomy continues to rise. Although catastrophic hemorrhage remains a dreaded complication, most published data suggest that sternal reentrance is safe, with negligible postoperative morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations are reoperative cardiac procedures. The aim of our study was to compare outcomes between first time sternotomy and resternotomy patients receiving continuous-flow LVADs, as a bridge to transplantation or destination therapy.
Methods And Materials: From March 2006 through February 2012, 100 patients underwent implantation of a HeartMate II or HeartWare LVAD at our institution. Patients were stratified into two groups, primary sternotomy and resternotomy. Variables were compared using two-sided t-tests, chi-square tests, Cox proportional hazards models, and log-rank tests to determine whether there was a difference between the two groups and if resternotomy was a significant independent predictor of outcome.
Results: We identified 29 patients (29%) who had resternotomy and 71 patients (71%) who had first time sternotomy. The resternotomy group was significantly older (56 years vs. 51 years, p = 0.05), was more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (69% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (31% vs. 14%, p = 0.05) and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (135 min vs. 100 min, p = 0.011). Survival rates at 30 days (93.1% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.564), 180 days (82.8% vs. 93%, p = 0.131), and 360 days (82.8% vs. 88.7%, p = 0.398) were similar for the resternotomy and primary sternotomy groups, respectively. Postoperative complications were also comparable, except for re-exploration for bleeding which was higher for the resternotomy group (17.2% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.029), although blood transfusion requirements were not significantly different (1.4 units vs. 1.2 units, p = 0.815). Left and right heart catheterization measurements and echocardiographic (ECHO) findings after 1 and 6 months of LVAD therapy were similar between the two groups.
Conclusions: Survival at 30, 180, and 360 days after LVAD implantation is similar between the resternotomy and primary sternotomy group. No major differences in complications or hemodynamic measurements were observed. Although a limited observational study, our findings agree with previously published resternotomy outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12048 | DOI Listing |
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
January 2025
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY. Electronic address:
Objectives: While valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) has demonstrated satisfactory outcomes, its utility in a reoperative sternotomy setting remains uncertain. This study evaluates the perioperative safety and long-term durability of reoperative sternotomy VSRR.
Methods: All consecutive VSRR at two centers from 2005-2020 were included.
Aorta (Stamford)
November 2024
Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Background: Aggressive surgical methods for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAD) can cause extended operating times and postoperative complications. less extensive techniques may increase the risk of needing further aortic reintervention. To prevent the need for extensive aortic arch surgery and subsequent re-sternotomy, hemiarch replacement (HAR) with innominate artery (a.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiovasc Dev Dis
November 2024
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Objective: Redo mitral valve surgery still represents a challenging and high-risk procedure in cardiac surgery. The incidence of cardiac structural injuries during re-sternotomy remains consistent and is reported to be an independent risk factor for hospital mortality. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery with retrograde femoral arterial perfusion and endo-aortic clamping avoids re-entry injuries and reduces the requirement for dissection of adhesions and the risk of damage to cardiac structures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntensive Care Med
December 2024
INSERM U1070 PHAR2, CHU de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Service des Urgences Adultes-SAMU 86 Centre 15, Poitiers, France.
Purpose: Whether skin disinfection of the surgical site using chlorhexidine-alcohol is superior to povidone-iodine-alcohol in reducing reoperation and surgical site infection rates after major cardiac surgery remains unclear.
Methods: CLEAN 2 was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-arm, assessor-blind, superiority trial conducted in eight French hospitals. We randomly assigned adult patients undergoing major heart or aortic surgery via sternotomy, with or without saphenous vein or radial artery harvesting, to have all surgical sites disinfected with either 2% chlorhexidine-alcohol or 5% povidone-iodine-alcohol.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Cases
October 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, 745-8522, Japan.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!