Background: Excessive iodine exposure is associated with thyroid dysfunction and thyroid autoimmunity. Most surgical hand-scrub solutions contain large amounts of iodine, and transcutaneous and mucosal absorption of iodine from these antiseptic solutions has been demonstrated. In this study we determined the effect of hand scrubbing with iodine-containing surgical hand-scrub solutions on urinary iodine concentrations (UICs) in operating room staff.
Methods: The study included 117 surgeons and surgical nurses from two different hospitals who often used surgical hand-scrub solutions as the iodine exposure group and 92 age-matched hospital staff from nonsurgical units of the same hospitals as the controls. In the iodine exposure group, 39 subjects (from hospital 1) used iodine-containing hand scrub solutions intermittently, and the remaining 78 in the surgical staff (from hospital 2) used only iodine-containing hand-scrub solutions. Morning spot urine specimens were collected from all participants for the analysis of UIC.
Results: The operating room staff had significantly higher UICs compared to the control group (142 μg/L [12-822 μg/L] vs. 89 μg/L [10-429 μg/L], p<0.001). UICs from 39% of the subjects from hospital 2 were found to reach levels higher than 300 μg/L.
Conclusion: Scrubbing with iodine-containing solutions might lead to iodine excess among surgical staff. Further studies investigating the effects of hand scrubbing with iodine-containing products on thyroid function and on thyroid antibodies of the operating room staff are needed to determine the consequences of this high iodine exposure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/thy.2012.0325 | DOI Listing |
Antibiotics (Basel)
May 2024
Microbiology Area-Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Surg Innov
June 2021
Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, 48533University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Surgical hand scrub is strongly recommended as an essential measure to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs). SSI results in morbidity and additional cost. Micropunctures may occur on surgical gloves during operation, thus hand scrub cannot be omitted in any condition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
October 2018
Facultad de Enfermeria y Podologia Universidade A Coruña. Spain.
Background: Chlorhexidine and parachlorometaxylenol (PCMX) are antiseptics recommended for surgical hand antisepsis. To our knowledge, PCMX has not been evaluated for bactericidal efficacy "in vivo.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover trial to compare the bacterial loads on fingertips and fingernails under laboratory conditions after use of antiseptic test products, including chlorhexidine digluconate 4%, PCMX 3%, and a reference solution of propan-1-ol 60% (P-1).
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
November 2017
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan.
Unlabelled: MINI: Fourteen hundred consecutive patients were investigated for evaluating the utility of waterless hand rub before orthopaedic surgery. The risk in the surgical site infection incidence was the same, but costs of liquids used for hand hygiene were cheaper and the hand hygiene time was shorter for waterless protocol, compared with traditional hand scrub.
Study Design: A retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data.
Vet Surg
May 2016
Departments of Companion Animal, Atlantic Veterinary Medicine, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Objective: To compare the antibacterial efficacy of different surgical hand antisepsis protocols used by veterinary students.
Study Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Study Population: Third year veterinary students (n=45).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!