A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Experimental assessment of four ultrasound scattering models for characterizing concentrated tissue-mimicking phantoms. | LitMetric

Experimental assessment of four ultrasound scattering models for characterizing concentrated tissue-mimicking phantoms.

J Acoust Soc Am

Laboratoire de Mécanique et d'Acoustique LMA-CNRS UPR 7051, Aix-Marseille Université, Centrale Marseille, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France.

Published: December 2012

Tissue-mimicking phantoms with high scatterer concentrations were examined using quantitative ultrasound techniques based on four scattering models: The Gaussian model (GM), the Faran model (FM), the structure factor model (SFM), and the particle model (PM). Experiments were conducted using 10- and 17.5-MHz focused transducers on tissue-mimicking phantoms with scatterer concentrations ranging from 1% to 25%. Theoretical backscatter coefficients (BSCs) were first compared with the experimentally measured BSCs in the forward problem framework. The measured BSC versus scatterer concentration relationship was predicted satisfactorily by the SFM and the PM. The FM and the PM overestimated the BSC magnitude at actual concentrations greater than 2.5% and 10%, respectively. The SFM was the model that better matched the BSC magnitude at all the scatterer concentrations tested. Second, the four scattering models were compared in the inverse problem framework to estimate the scatterer size and concentration from the experimentally measured BSCs. The FM did not predict the concentration accurately at actual concentrations greater than 12.5%. The SFM and PM need to be associated with another quantitative parameter to differentiate between low and high concentrations. In that case, the SFM predicted the concentration satisfactorily with relative errors below 38% at actual concentrations ranging from 10% to 25%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4765072DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scattering models
12
tissue-mimicking phantoms
12
scatterer concentrations
12
actual concentrations
12
concentrations ranging
8
experimentally measured
8
measured bscs
8
problem framework
8
bsc magnitude
8
concentrations greater
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!