A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Rate of visual field progression in eyes with optic disc hemorrhages in the ocular hypertension treatment study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared visual field changes in eyes with ocular hypertension, focusing on those with and without optic disc hemorrhage (DH).
  • Over a 12-year span, 2,607 eyes from 1,378 participants showed a significant rate of visual field deterioration in eyes with DH compared to those without.
  • Results suggest that eyes with DH experienced more rapid changes and may require closer monitoring and potentially more aggressive treatment to manage their condition.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare rates of visual field (VF) change in ocular hypertensive eyes with and without optic dischemorrhage (DH).

Methods: Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study subjects(minimum 10 reliable VF tests, followed up 5 years) were included. Trend analyses of VF sequences over time of DH and non-DH eyes were assessed by regression of mean deviation (MDR) and pointwise linear regression (PLR). The main outcome measures were rates of VF change in DH and non-DH eyes.

Results: Two thousand six hundred seven eyes (1378 participants) were included. The mean (SD) number of VF tests per eye was 23.7 (4.9) spanning a mean (SD) of 12.2 (2.0) years. At least 1 DH was detected in 187 eyes(7.2%), of which 52 eyes had recurrent DH. Mean deviation rate of change was significantly worse in DH compared with non-DH eyes (mean [SD], −0.17 [0.27] vs−0.07 [0.19] dB/y; P<.01). Significant PLR progression occurred more frequently in eyes with DH (odds ratio,3.6; P<.01), which increased when 2 or more DHs were present (odds ratio, 4.2; P=.01). Eyes initially randomized to treatment were less likely to have a DH during follow-up.

Conclusions: Eyes with DH had more rapid VF deterioration when assessed by global (MDR) or local (PLR)trend analysis than eyes without DH. Eyes with recurrent DH had similar rates of global VF change (MDR)when compared with eyes with a single DH but reached criteria for rapid PLR change more often. Intraocular pressure reduction in ocular hypertension reduces the risk of developing a DH. Ocular hypertensive eyes with DH should be monitored closely and may need more aggressive therapy.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000125

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1137DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual field
8
eyes optic
8
ocular hypertension
8
hypertension treatment
8
treatment study
8
non-dh eyes
8
eyes
6
rate visual
4
field progression
4
progression eyes
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!