A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Positive end-expiratory pressure lung recruitment: comparison between lower inflection point and ultrasound assessment. | LitMetric

Background: Maintenance of the open lung alveoli in the expiration on mechanical ventilation in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) remains challenging despite advances in lung imaging. The inspiratory lower inflection point (LIP) on the ventilator pressure-volume (P-V) curve estimates the required end-expiratory pressure for recruitment of alveolar consolidation. Alternatively, the end-expiratory pressure for recruitment of crater-like subpleural alveolar consolidation could be simply followed with ultrasound. These two methods for setting the ventilators positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were compared.

Methods: The observational study in surgical/neurosurgical intensive care between October 2009 and November 2011 included 17 deeply sedated or relaxed patients. LIP was measured with continuous low-flow method, as a pressure in cmH(2)O. Expiratory levelling between lower border of subpleural consolidation and adjacent pleural line, which means lung recruitment, was followed with linear ultrasound probe. PEEP in cmH(2)O at which the levelling occurs was compared with LIP pressure.

Results: LIP pressure never exceeds the PEEP for recruitment of subpleural consolidations followed with ultrasound. A significant correlation (r = 0.839; p < 0.05) was found between two methods.

Conclusions: In this study, positive end-expiratory pressures for recruitment of subpleural consolidations followed by ultrasound always exceed the pressures measured with LIP. Respecting this, ultrasound method could be the guide for PEEP lung recruitment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-012-0303-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

end-expiratory pressure
16
positive end-expiratory
8
lung recruitment
8
lower inflection
8
inflection point
8
pressure recruitment
8
alveolar consolidation
8
pressure
6
lung
5
recruitment
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!