A versatile method for generating T2 -weighting is a T2 -preparation module, which has been used successfully for cardiac imaging at 1.5T. Although it has been applied at 3T, higher fields (B0 ≥ 3T) can degrade B0 and B1 homogeneity and result in nonuniform magnetization preparation. For cardiac imaging, blood flow and cardiac motion may further impair magnetization preparation. In this study, a novel T2 -preparation module containing multiple adiabatic B1 -insensitive refocusing pulses is introduced and compared with three previously described modules [(a) composite MLEV4, (b) modified BIR-4 (mBIR-4), and (c) Silver-Hoult-pair]. In the static phantom, the proposed module provided similar or better B0 and B1 insensitivity than the other modules. In human subjects (n = 21), quantitative measurement of image signal coefficient of variation, reflecting overall image inhomogeneity, was lower for the proposed module (0.10) than for MLEV4 (0.15, P < 0.0001), mBIR-4 (0.27, P < 0.0001), and Silver-Hoult-pair (0.14, P = 0.001) modules. Similarly, qualitative analysis revealed that the proposed module had the best image quality scores and ranking (both, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, we present a new T2 -preparation module, which is shown to be robust for cardiac imaging at 3T in comparison with existing methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3926429PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24564DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

-preparation module
16
cardiac imaging
16
proposed module
12
module cardiac
8
magnetization preparation
8
module
7
cardiac
5
motion flow
4
flow insensitive
4
insensitive adiabatic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!