A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Optical properties of current ceramics systems for laminate veneers. | LitMetric

Optical properties of current ceramics systems for laminate veneers.

J Dent

DDS Izmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Izmir, Turkey.

Published: August 2013

Objectives: Full-ceramic systems can be produced by different techniques (layering, heatpressing, CAD/CAM) and have various compositions with different crystalline contents that may affect the optical properties of laminate restorations.

Methods: A total of 60 specimens were prepared from e.max Press, e.max CAD, Empress Esthetic, e.max Ceram, Inline, and ZirPress systems (A1 shade; diameter 10mm; thickness 0.5 ± 0.05mm). The L*, a*, and b* values, chroma and translucency (TP) of each system were recorded before and after ageing. The statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA, Tukey's tests and the paired sample t-test (p<0.05).

Results: The L* value of the shade guide was significantly different from those of the full-ceramic systems; however, there were no significant differences between the a* values of Ceram, Esthetic, Inline and Zirpress. There were significant differences between the b* values of the shade guide compared with the full-ceramics except for e.max Press. The L* values decreased, and the a* and b* values increased after the ageing process for all groups. There were no significant differences between the ΔE values of the ceramic systems (p>0.05). The TP values decreased, and the chroma value increased significantly after the ageing process (p>0.05). The chroma of the shade guide was found to be the highest.

Conclusions: None of the full-ceramic systems was able to match the color of the shade guide. The chemical structures of the ceramic systems were more effective for determining the optical parameters than the fabrication techniques. Ageing caused full-ceramics to become more opaque, darker, reddish and yellowish.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

optical properties
8
full-ceramic systems
8
shade guide
8
systems
5
properties current
4
current ceramics
4
ceramics systems
4
systems laminate
4
laminate veneers
4
veneers objectives
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!