[Atypical agents of wound infection and targeted samples].

Acta Med Croatica

Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.

Published: October 2012

All open wounds are primarily contaminated and subsequently colonized by microorganisms, predominantly bacteria. Only about 30% of chronic wounds are also infected. Factors which favor the development of infection are the following: large quantity of bacteria, presence of virulence factors, their quantity and number, predominantly the synergy of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, and formation of biofilm. Common agents of infection of acute and chronic wounds are Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, Streptococcus beta-haemolyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacteroides spp., and Candida albicans. Difference between acute and chronic wound is in the predominance of individual agents, with an observation that Staphylococcus aureus is predominant in both cases. Atypical agents of chronic wound infection are rare, unusual, not found in the area in which we live, not proven by standard microbiological methods, but molecular methods are needed instead. They are predominantly opportunists, varying in the expression of virulence factors, or they have changed their phenotype characteristics and are not the agents of primary wound infections. They are the agents of secondary infections. Atypical agents of the chronic wound infection are diverse, from the anaerobe group, Peptoniphilus spp., Anaerococcus spp., Bacteroides ureolyticus, Finegoldia magma, the group of gram positive rods of the Corynebacterium genus, the group of bacteria from aquatic environment Mycobacterium fortuitum complex, and Vibrio alginolyticus. The targeted samples are biopsy sample as the "gold standard" and/or aspirate, when a significant quantity of exudate is present. Targeted samples are obligatory when there is a progression and decomposition of the base of the wound, increase in the size or depth of the wound, isolation of multiresistant microbes, or absence of clinical response to empirical antimicrobial therapy. In the diagnosis of opportunistic pathogens or atypical agents of chronic wound infection, it is necessary to be thorough, meticulous, and conduct revision of the patient, diagnosis, treatment and samples. Crucial for the detection of the agents atypical wound infection is discussion and agreement with clinical microbiologist. Essential for the quality diagnosis is decontamination of the wound before taking targeted samples. The targeted sample is biopsy specimen as the "gold standard", less frequently aspirate, depending on the quantity and content of the wound. Swab as a sample is not recommended. If there is no other choice, only exceptionally surface swabs may be taken, but only under the following conditions: decontamination of the wound with the application of Levine's or Z-technique of taking of swabs.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wound infection
20
chronic wound
16
wound
12
atypical agents
12
agents chronic
12
targeted samples
12
chronic wounds
8
virulence factors
8
agents
8
acute chronic
8

Similar Publications

Disease tolerance is a host response to infection that limits collateral damage to host tissues while having a neutral effect on pathogen fitness. Previously, we found that the pathogenic lactic acid bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes manipulates disease tolerance using its aerobic mixed-acid fermentation pathway via the enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase, but the microbe-derived molecules that mediate communication with the host's disease tolerance pathways remain elusive. Here we show in a murine model that aerobic mixed-acid fermentation inhibits the accumulation of inflammatory cells including neutrophils and macrophages, reduces the immunosuppressive cytokine interleukin-10, and delays bacterial clearance and wound healing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An ideal wound dressing should possess high mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties while being simple and affordable. So, a dual-layer hydrogel-nanofiber wound dressing was fabricated in this study. The hydrogel as the inner layer was prepared using sodium alginate and guar gum, while the nanofiber layer was made of polyvinyl alcohol and chitosan enriched with Ciprofloxacin.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: The literature extensively describes the influence of operative time (OT) on postoperative outcomes, but the extent of its impact on thoracolumbar fusion (TLF) outcomes remains unclear. This study aims to identify the threshold beyond which OT increases the risk of surgical adverse events and quantify the association between increased OT and postoperative complications.

Design: A total of 66,904 patients who underwent thoracolumbar fracture surgery between 2010-2021 were identified from the College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does the dressing matter in pediatric partial-thickness burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Burns

February 2025

Amalia Centre of Expertise Pediatric Trauma and Burns, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Superficial partial thickness burns typically receive nonoperative treatment, whereas deep partial thickness burns, which are prone to hypertrophic scarring, are usually managed through debridement followed by autologous split-thickness skin grafting. Various therapies have been developed to prevent wound infection and to enhance wound healing in pediatric partial-thickness burns. However, the choice of dressing by the surgeon can be influenced by various factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) following colon surgery continue to pose a significant clinical and financial impact on a healthcare system. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) utilizes the Complex 30-day SSI model to report the predictive number of infections for a hospital, which is submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. However, this model does not account for patient acuity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!