Background And Importance: The safety of flow-diverting stents for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms is unknown.

Clinical Presentation: A 35-year-old woman with a ruptured dissecting aneurysm of the intradural right vertebral artery and incorporating the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery was treated with a Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). Five days after reconstruction of the diseased right vertebral segment, she was treated for vasospasm, and retraction of the PED was observed, leaving her dissecting aneurysm unprotected. A second PED was placed with coverage of the aneurysm, but vasospasm complicated optimal positioning of the device.

Conclusion: In addition to the potential risks of dual antiplatelet therapy in these patients, this case illustrates 2 pitfalls of flow-diverting devices in vessels in vasospasm: delayed retraction of the device and difficulty positioning the device for deployment in the setting of vasospasm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827fc9beDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pipeline embolization
12
embolization device
12
delayed retraction
8
dissecting aneurysm
8
device
5
retraction pipeline
4
device corking
4
corking failure
4
failure pitfalls
4
pitfalls pipeline
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Flow diversion is an effective first-line treatment for intracranial aneurysms; however, the rate of incomplete occlusion is not insignificant. Data in neuroendovascular literature is limited regarding the implications of persistent incomplete occlusion despite flow diversion.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database and identified 125 consecutive patients with treatment naïve intracranial aneurysms who underwent flow diversion with the PED from April 2014 - November 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The FRED-X is a newer generation flow diverting stent (FDS) with surface modification that has demonstrated favorable efficacy in treating intracranial aneurysms. Our study provides an analysis of patients treated using FRED-X compared to FRED, PED Shield and PED.

Materials And Methods: This was a retrospective single center study and a systematic review with network meta analysis of patients who underwent flow diversion using FRED-X, FRED, PED Shield or PED.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Iatrogenic injury to neck vasculature is a potentially life-threatening complication of spine surgery. We present an illustrative case describing the use of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) in the emergent reconstruction of the vertebral artery (VA) following vessel laceration. In addition, we document a systematic review concerning the use of the PED in acute to chronic iatrogenic injury of the internal carotid or VAs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The Pipeline Vantage embolization device is a new fourth-generation tool designed to treat intracranial aneurysms, and this study evaluates its safety and effectiveness.
  • The research involved 12 patients, primarily women, with a variety of aneurysm types, and demonstrated a 100% success rate in device deployment without intraoperative complications.
  • One postprocedural complication occurred, and the findings represent the first US analysis of this device's use in patients with intracranial aneurysms, highlighting its potential for treating both ruptured and unruptured cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!