Predicting scholars' scientific impact.

PLoS One

ETH Zürich, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and Simulation, Zürich, Switzerland.

Published: May 2013

We tested the underlying assumption that citation counts are reliable predictors of future success, analyzing complete citation data on the careers of ~150,000 scientists. Our results show that i) among all citation indicators, the annual citations at the time of prediction is the best predictor of future citations, ii) future citations of a scientist's published papers can be predicted accurately (r(2) = 0.80 for a 1-year prediction, P<0.001) but iii) future citations of future work are hardly predictable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504022PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049246PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

future citations
8
predicting scholars'
4
scholars' scientific
4
scientific impact
4
impact tested
4
tested underlying
4
underlying assumption
4
assumption citation
4
citation counts
4
counts reliable
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!