TMS stimulus-response asymmetry in left- and right-handed individuals.

Exp Brain Res

Department of Health Sciences, Division of Kinesiology and Human Motor Learning, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON, Canada.

Published: February 2013

There have been inconsistencies in the literature regarding asymmetrical neural control and results of experiments using TMS techniques. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further our understanding of the neural relationships that may underlie performance asymmetry with respect to the distal muscles of the hand using a TMS stimulus-response curve technique. Twenty-four male subjects (12 right handed, 12 left handed) participated in a TMS stimulus-response (S-R) curve trial. Focal TMS was applied over the motor cortex to find the optimal position for the first dorsal interossei muscle and to determine rest threshold (RTh). Seven TMS intensities ranging from 90 to 150 % of RTh were delivered in 10 % increments. One single TMS block consisted of 16 stimuli at each intensity. Peak-to-peak amplitudes were measured and the S-R curve generated. In right-handed subjects, the mean difference in slopes between the right and left hand was -0.011 ± 0.03, while the mean difference between hands in left-handed subjects was -0.049 ± 0.08. Left-handed normalized data in right handers displayed a mean of 1.616 ± 1.019 (two-tailed t test p < 0.05). The left-handed group showed a significant change in the normalized slope as indicated by a mean of 1.693 ± 0.149 (two-tailed t test p < 0.00006). The results found in this study reinforce previous work which suggests that there is an asymmetry in neural drive that exists in both left- and right-handed individuals. However, the results show that the non-dominant motor hemisphere displays a greater amount of excitability than the dominant, which goes against the conventional dogma. This asymmetry indicates that the non-dominant hemisphere may have a higher level of excitation or a lower level of inhibition for both groups of participants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3320-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tms stimulus-response
12
s-r curve
8
tms
7
stimulus-response asymmetry
4
asymmetry left-
4
left- right-handed
4
right-handed individuals
4
individuals inconsistencies
4
inconsistencies literature
4
literature asymmetrical
4

Similar Publications

The aim of the present study was to determine if anodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) affects corticospinal excitability (CSE) and voluntary activation (VA) of the quadriceps femoris muscle (QM). This was a double-blind, randomized study in which spine-shoulder anodal tsDCS (active electrode centered over T11-12, 2.5 mA, 20 min) was applied in a seated position.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) protocols targeting primary motor cortex (M1) are used in rehabilitation of neurological diseases for their therapeutic potential, safety, and tolerability. Although lower intensity LF-rTMS can modulate M1 neurophysiology, results are variable, and a systematic assessment of its dose effect is lacking.

Objectives: To determine the dose-response of LF-rTMS on stimulated and non-stimulated M1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preparatory control in task-switching has been suggested to rely upon a set of distributed regions within a frontoparietal network, with frontal and parietal cortical areas cooperating to implement switch-specific preparation processes. Although recent causal evidence using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have generally supported this model, alternative results from both functional neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies have questioned the switch-specific role of both frontal and parietal cortices. The aim of the present study was to clarify the involvement of prefrontal and parietal areas in preparatory cognitive control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Large-scale networks underpin brain functions. How such networks respond to focal stimulation can help decipher complex brain processes and optimize brain stimulation treatments. To map such stimulation-response patterns across the brain non-invasively, we recorded concurrent EEG responses from single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Distinct neuronal circuits mediate cortical hyperexcitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Brain

July 2024

Brain and Nerve Research Centre, Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2139, Australia.

Article Synopsis
  • Cortical hyperexcitability plays a key role in ALS, showing altered interactions between inhibitory and facilitatory processes in the brain.
  • Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), researchers assessed motor function and cognitive performance in ALS patients, revealing significant differences in short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) compared to healthy individuals.
  • Results indicated reduced SICI in ALS patients with specific coil orientations, along with a positive correlation between SICI levels and cognitive scores, while SICF was found to be increased in ALS patients in certain orientations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!