Best interests and the sanctity of life after W v M.

J Med Ethics

Centre for Social and Ethical Policy, University ofManchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Published: September 2013

The case of W v M and Others, in which the court rejected an application to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a woman in a minimally conscious state, raises a number of profoundly important medico-legal issues. This article questions whether the requirement to respect the autonomy of incompetent patients, under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, is being unjustifiably disregarded in order to prioritise the sanctity of life. When patients have made informal statements of wishes and views, which clearly--if not precisely--apply to their present situation, judges should not feel free to usurp such expressions of autonomy unless there are compelling reasons for so doing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100907DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sanctity life
8
best interests
4
interests sanctity
4
life case
4
case court
4
court rejected
4
rejected application
4
application withdraw
4
withdraw artificial
4
artificial nutrition
4

Similar Publications

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has caught the attention of the world as it challenges the status quo on human operations. As AI has dramatically impacted education, healthcare, industry, and economics, a Catholic ethical study of human dignity in the context of AI in healthcare is presented in this article. The debates regarding whether AI will usher well or doom the dignity of humankind are occasioned by increasing developments of technology in patient care and medical decision-making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Advancing teleoperation for legged manipulation with wearable motion capture.

Front Robot AI

December 2024

Intelligent Robotics Research Group, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

The sanctity of human life mandates the replacement of individuals with robotic systems in the execution of hazardous tasks. Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD), a field fraught with mortal danger, stands at the forefront of this transition. In this study, we explore the potential of robotic telepresence as a safeguard for human operatives, drawing on the robust capabilities demonstrated by legged manipulators in diverse operational contexts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Clinical guidelines rely on sound evidence to underpin recommendations for patient care. Compromised research integrity can erode public trust and the credibility of the scientific enterprise, with potential harm to patients. Despite increased recognition of integrity concerns in scientific literature, there are no processes or guidance for incorporating integrity assessments into evidence-based guideline development or evidence synthesis more broadly.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Science and Islamic ethics: Navigating artificial womb technology through Quranic principles.

Heliyon

September 2024

College of Sharia and Islamic Studies, Al-Qasimia University, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

This paper explores the complex interplay between scientific innovation and religious ethics, with a specific focus on the ethical implications of Artificial Womb Technology (AWT) as interpreted through the lens of Quranic teachings on the essence of life. The objective is to meld the burgeoning field of reproductive technologies with the foundational principles of Islamic theology through an examination of Islamic jurisprudential rulings, contemporary bioethical discourse and innovations in reproductive technology. In addition to attention given to the compatibility of AWT with Islamic teachings concerning the sanctity of life, there is also a focus on the concept of motherhood and the preservation of family structure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Baruch Brody and the principle of justifiable homicide.

Theor Med Bioeth

October 2024

Center for Ethical Leadership, University of St. Thomas, Houston, TX, USA.

In a series of papers in the early 1970s and in his important book Abortion and the Sanctity of Human Life (1975), Baruch Brody offered what remains to this day one of the most philosophically rigorous contributions to the debate concerning the morality of abortion and the ethics of homicide more generally. In this paper I would like to critically examine Brody's argument that abortion is sometimes justifiable in some cases even when (1) one cannot claim self-defense, or (2) diminished responsibility, and (3) the abortion is a 'killing' rather than a 'not saving.' This justification, I argue, is limited to certain cases in which the life of the mother is at stake.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!