Objectives: Colorectal flat adenomas have been associated with a higher risk of colorectal malignancy. We describe demographic characteristics and endoscopic findings in patients with colorectal flat adenomas.

Methods: In total, 1934 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were prospectively included. Polyp shape was classified according to the Japanese classification. Chromoendoscopy was applied whenever a flat lesion was suspected. Indications for colonoscopy, demographic data, and characteristics of neoplastic lesions were recorded. Patients were classified as follows: group 1, no adenomas (n=1250); group 2, only protruding adenomas (n=427); group 3, protruding and flat adenomas (n=118); and group 4, only flat adenomas (n=139).

Results: Approximately one in every 10 patients (13.2%) had flat adenomas. Among them, concomitant protruding adenomas were identified in approximately half of the cases. In multivariate analysis, age older than 50 years [odds ratio (OR)=1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.08-2.43, P=0.02], protruding adenomas (OR=2.17; 95% CI=1.65-2.87, P<0.001), follow-up colonoscopy for polyps or cancer (OR=2.22; 95% CI=1.59-3.10, P<0.001), screening colonoscopy (OR=1.60, 95% CI=1.15-2.22, P=0.005), and specifically trained endoscopist (OR=2.02, 95% CI=1.53-2.68, P<0.001) were associated independently with flat adenoma detection.

Conclusion: Flat adenomas have specific demographic factors that might help to improve detection. Particularly, age older than 50 years, colorectal neoplasia surveillance, and the presence of protruding adenomas should alert endoscopists to the possible presence of these lesions. Trained endoscopists may offer a greater chance of detecting these lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835b2d45DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flat adenomas
16
colorectal flat
12
protruding adenomas
12
adenomas
8
group protruding
8
flat
7
risk factors
4
factors associated
4
colorectal
4
associated colorectal
4

Similar Publications

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant public health challenge. Patients having abnormal faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results are offered a colonoscopy. The effectiveness of colonoscopies can, however, often be challenged by the occurrence of missed polyps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining wider acceptance in most surgical specialties. However, in the United Kingdom, endocrine surgery has not fully adopted robotics. This paper aims to present the early experience and outcomes of patients who underwent robotic-assisted adrenalectomy at a tertiary referral endocrine surgery department.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Rectal mucosal prolapse syndrome (RMPS) often presents with symptoms like rectal bleeding and can be mistaken for malignant rectal tumors (MRT) during endoscopic exams; this study aimed to differentiate between the two and examine RMPS characteristics.
  • - A total of 826 patients were analyzed, revealing that RMPS patients were younger, had smaller lesions, and a longer clinical course compared to those with MRT.
  • - Five distinct morphological phenotypes of RMPS lesions were identified, with gender differences noted in lesion types; key features like age, lesion size, and clinical duration can help differentiate RMPS from MRT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Description: Nonampullary duodenal polyps are found in up to 5% of all upper endoscopies; the vast majority are identified incidentally in asymptomatic patients. Although most are benign, adenomas are estimated to account for 10%-20% of these lesions. Most international guidelines recommend that all duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection; this may be associated with a near 15% adverse event rate (predominantly bleeding and perforation) in prospective studies, with substantial local recurrence on surveillance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mesothelioma is a fatal disease that has historically been associated with exposure to airborne asbestos. Because occupational asbestos exposures dropped dramatically in the late 1960s and early 1970s, far fewer cases of mesothelioma today are due to these fibers but, instead, are usually a result of the aging process or genetic predisposition. In May of 2022, a Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) was issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding malignant mesothelioma incidence in women from 1999 to 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!