Effect of concomitant asymmetric septal hypertrophy when assessing the severity of aortic valve stenosis: an in-vitro study.

J Heart Valve Dis

Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montrial, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.

Published: September 2012

Background And Aim Of The Study: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is an important cardiovascular disease that affects between 2% and 7% of the elderly population in industrialized countries. AS often coexists with asymmetric septal hypertrophy (ASH), which is generally caused by a protrusion of the hypertrophied left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) just below the aortic valve. The study aim was to determine, based on measurement of the aortic valve effective orifice area (EOA), if ASH might potentially interfere with the assessment of AS severity.

Methods: The effects of different levels of ASH (from normal to 90%) on the EOA measured from orifices mimicking different AS severities, and from a home-built AS model constructed from a bioprosthetic aortic valve, were examined in a pulsatile flow in-vitro model.

Results: For the most severe AS, the level of ASH had no impact on the measured EOA. In contrast, for the less severe AS, beyond an ASH level of 50% the AS severity was progressively overestimated, and reached a reduction of about 60% of EOA for a ASH level of 90%.

Conclusion: The presence of concomitant ASH may cause an overestimation of the hemodynamic severity of AS. The extent of overestimation is more important in less-severe AS. Hence, the presence of ASH may lead the clinician to conclude, erroneously, that the AS is severe and that aortic valve replacement is indicated. However, beyond an ASH level of 50% the AS severity can be accurately determined.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aortic valve
24
ash level
12
ash
9
asymmetric septal
8
septal hypertrophy
8
valve stenosis
8
eoa ash
8
level 50%
8
50% severity
8
aortic
6

Similar Publications

Transcatheter aortic valve repair (TAVR) presents a minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical valve replacement, albeit not without its own set of complications. A rare complication is the infolding of the self-expanding valve, which can precipitate cardiac arrest. The estimated incidence rate of this complication stands at 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a viable treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis among all risk subsets. As TAVR use becomes more prevalent and patients live longer with their transcatheter valve, an increasing number of these patients can be expected to present with ACS. Overall, there is a paucity of high-quality data detailing incidence, pathophysiology, and management of ACS in this subset.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To assess the effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on electrocardiographic remodeling in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), and identify its influencing factors. A cohort study was conducted on patients with a confirmed diagnosis of severe AS who successfully underwent TAVR at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University between June 2018 and March 2023. Data, including standard 15-lead electrocardiograms and echocardiograms, were collected before the operation, 1 week after the operation, and 3 months after the operation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score is a risk factor for acute kidney injury after surgical aortic valve replacement.

Ren Fail

December 2025

Center for Cardiac Intensive Care, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.

Background: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) increases after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study aimed to characterize the risk factors of AKI after SAVR.

Methods And Results: We conducted a retrospective registry study based on data from 299 consecutive patients undergoing SAVR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the commonly used approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with aortic stenosis at low or intermediate surgical risk. However, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to SAVR for AVR. This meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of TAVR versus SAVR in low-to-intermediate surgical risk patients by analyzing temporal trends in the outcomes of TAVR and SAVR at various follow-up intervals, providing a more detailed understanding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!