A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor as an agent for wound bed preparation in traumatic wounds. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF) gel against traditional saline dressings for preparing wounds needing skin grafts.
  • In a randomized trial involving 155 patients with traumatic wounds, both groups showed similar times for granulation tissue appearance and re-epithelialization.
  • Ultimately, the results indicated that rhPDGF did not improve wound healing compared to the conventional moist dressing method.

Article Abstract

Background: In patients with life-threatening injuries, simple wounds requiring split-thickness skin grafts (SSG) often get neglected. These then need SSG once they are covered with granulation tissue through wound bed preparation. Traditionally, this is done by daily moist dressings. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF) has been shown to improve healing in chronic wounds.

Aim: The present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of rhPDGF in wound bed preparation with the current practice of daily saline dressings.

Setting And Design: A prospective randomised, single-blinded study was carried out for evaluation in traumatic wounds.

Materials And Methods: The patients were randomised and divided into a control group that was subjected to saline dressings and a test group that was treated with rhPDGF gel. Both the groups were then compared. The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 16.0 and the quantitative variables were analysed using unpaired "t" test, while the pre- and post-intervention effects were assessed using paired "t" test. The 95% CI values were also included.

Results: Of the 155 wounds studied, time taken for appearance of granulation tissue (in days) in the test group had a mean of 13.81 ± 2.68, while that in the control group was 13.36 ± 3.81 (P = 0.401). Complete re-epithelialisation without discharge occurred in the control group with a mean value of 28.9 ± 3.67 days, while that in the test group had a mean of 31.17 ± 4.82 days.

Conclusion: There was no difference in wound healing between the patients treated with rhPDGF compared to those treated by conventional moist dressings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495368PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.101279DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wound bed
12
bed preparation
12
control group
12
test group
12
recombinant human
8
human platelet-derived
8
platelet-derived growth
8
growth factor
8
granulation tissue
8
moist dressings
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!