Purpose: To evaluate the effect of cycloplegia on ocular biometry measurements and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland) and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) biometers and to assess the agreement between the devices.
Methods: Measurements were taken with the Lenstar and the IOLMaster on 43 healthy volunteers with a mean age of 22.1 ± 4.7 years (range, 18 to 37 years). Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal curvature, and horizontal iris width (white-to-white [WTW]) measurements were performed with and without cycloplegia. The IOL powers were calculated using four formulas: Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/Theoretical, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis.
Results: Cycloplegia had no significant effect on AL or corneal curvature. However, ACD and WTW significantly increased postcycloplegia (Lenstar, 0.09 ± 0.06 mm and 0.10 ± 0.17 mm, respectively; IOLMaster, 0.06 ± 0.07 mm and 0.43 ± 0.35 mm, respectively; p <0.001). The Lenstar AL measurements were statistically but not clinically significantly longer than those of the IOLMaster (precycloplegia, 0.03 ± 0.03 mm; postcycloplegia, 0.02 ± 0.03 mm; p < 0.001). For ACD measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were -0.19 to 0.20 mm without cycloplegia and -0.11 to 0.17 mm with cycloplegia. The 95% limits of agreement for WTW measurements were -1.07 to 0.45 mm with cycloplegia. The only significantly different IOL power precycloplegia and postcycloplegia was with the Haigis formula and the Lenstar measurements: 15.12 ± 3.87 diopters and 15.26 ± 3.92 diopters (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Cycloplegia affected ACD and WTW but not AL or corneal curvature measurements. Generally, good agreement was found between the Lenstar and the IOLMaster, although not for WTW. Differences between these devices do not produce a clinically significant impact on IOL power.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182772f4f | DOI Listing |
J Cataract Refract Surg
November 2024
Sengi, Penniac, NB Canada E3A 8X8.
Purpose: To evaluate measurement variability between different readily available automated biometric devices for the purposes of improving surgeon decision making for phakic intraocular lens (IOL) sizing.
Setting: Private practice (Houston, TX, USA).
Design: Prospective, single center, bilateral, non-randomized, open-label, observational study.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
July 2024
School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Purpose: To assess the feasibility of using multifunction instruments to measure axial length for monitoring myopia progression in children and adults.
Methods: Axial length was measured in 60 children (aged 6-18 years) and 60 adults (aged 19-50 years) with multifunction instruments (Myah and Myopia Master) and stand-alone biometers (Lenstar LS900 and IOLMaster 700). Repeatability (measurements by the same examiner) and reproducibility (measurements by different examiners) were computed as the within-subject standard deviation (Sw) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA).
Am J Ophthalmol
September 2024
From the National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital (L.W., X.S., J.L.F., J.J.H., K.J.Z., R.L., A.Y.Y.), Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; National Engineering Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital (A.Y.Y.), Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. Electronic address:
Purpose: To investigate the repeatability and agreement of corneal astigmatism measurements in eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism component (ICAC) using four devices: IOLMaster 700 biometer, Lenstar 900 biometer, iTrace, and Pentacam.
Design: Prospective cross-sectional reliability analysis.
Methods: Sixty-four eyes (52 patients) with ICAC were examined three times using the four devices.
J Curr Ophthalmol
December 2023
Department of Ophthalmology, New Zealand National Eye Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Purpose: To assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates.
Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT).
J Cataract Refract Surg
December 2023
From the Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia (Shah, Or); Lions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia (Shah, Or, Barrett); Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame, Perth, Australia (Jacques); Department of Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia (Jacques); Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia (Barrett).
Purpose: To compare astigmatic outcomes using the Integrated K method and anterior surface keratometry from 3 different biometric devices.
Setting: Lions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia.
Design: Retrospective case series.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!